Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26208576›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2015

Psychological vulnerability to daily stressors in old age: Results of short-term longitudinal studies.

Oliver Karl Schilling, Manfred Diehl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Age, Neuroticism, and Stressor-Related Negative Affect: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from a Measurement Burst Study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Optimism, Daily Stressors, and Emotional Well-Being Over Two Decades in a Cohort of Aging Men.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Depression among health workers caring for patients with COVID-19 in Egypt.The Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver Karl SchillingAbteilung für Psychologische Alternsforschung, Psychologisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany, oliver.schilling@psychologie.uni-heidelberg.de.
Manfred Diehl
Colorado State University · USHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

Measuring Adults' Awareness of Age-Related Change (AARC)R21AG041379 · NIA · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DIEHL, MANFRED K. · 2012 to 2012
$135k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG041379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing numbers of intensive longitudinal studies examine the short-term variability of behavior in response to daily stressors. Collectively, these studies address the vulnerability for stress-related emotional burden as assessed in terms of the intraindividual association between daily stressors and negative affect (NA). This article provides a brief overview of the relevant research on so-called affective reactivity to daily stressors and focuses on findings on development of age-related stressor reactivity across the adult lifespan. Two theoretical propositions have been put forward. Firstly, it has been postulated that aging should be associated with increased affective reactivity, i.e. it has been assumed that the vulnerability in terms of physiological stress reactivity increases across the adult life span and, thus, a higher stress-induced emotional reactivity should result with increasing age. Secondly, it has been argued that due to the continued development of emotional self-regulation skills, there should be an age-related decrease in stress reactivity and, hence, an increased resilience. Findings on age differences in NA reactivity to daily stressors, however, have been inconsistent. A possible explanation for the inconsistent findings may lie in the fact that the postulated dynamics of increased vulnerability or resilience imply different time-related reactions to stressors. In particular, the activation and effectiveness of emotional self-regulation strategies increase with increasing time intervals from the stressors. This leads to the conclusion that with increasing age the resilience for longer periods of stress and accumulated stress should increase. Results from our own research support this hypothesis, where older adults reacted to multiple stressors in a more adaptive way than younger adults.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAgingDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHumansIncidenceIntergenerational RelationsLife StyleLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID26208576
OpenAlexW1525784587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.