Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26208500›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2015

Communities of practice for supporting health systems change: a missed opportunity.

Anita Kothari, Jennifer A Boyko, James Conklin, Paul Stolee, Shannon L Sibbald

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anita KothariWestern University, School of Health Studies and Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, 1151 Richmond St, London, N6A 3K7, Canada. akothari@uwo.ca.
Jennifer A BoykoWestern University, School of Health Studies and Faculty of Information and Media Studies, London, Canada. jboyko@uwo.ca.
James ConklinDepartment of Applied Human Sciences and Élisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Concordia University, Portland, USA. james.conklin@concordia.ca.
Paul StoleeUniversity of Waterloo, School of Public Health and Health Systems, Waterloo, Canada. stolee@uwaterloo.ca.
Shannon L SibbaldWestern University, School of Health Studies, Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health and Department of Family Medicine, London, Canada. ssibbald@uwo.ca.
Western University · CAConcordia University · USUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunities of practice (CoPs) have been used in the health sector to support professional practice change. However, little is known about how CoPs might be used to influence a system that requires change at and across various levels (i.e. front line care, organizational, governmental). In this paper we examine the experience of a CoP in the Canadian province of Ontario as it engages in improving the care of seniors. Our aim is to shed light on using CoPs to facilitate systems change.

methodsThis paper draws on year one findings of a larger multiple case study that is aiming to increase understanding of knowledge translation processes mobilized through CoPs. In this paper we strategically report on one case to illustrate a critical example of a CoP trying to effect systems change. Primary data included semi-structured interviews with CoP members (n = 8), field notes from five planning meetings, and relevant background documents. Data analysis included deductive coding (i.e. pre-determined codes aligned with the larger project) and inductive coding which allowed codes and themes to emerge. A thorough description of the case was prepared using all the coded data.

resultsThe CoP recognized a need to support health professionals (nurses, dentists) and related paraprofessionals with knowledge, experience, and resources to appropriately address their clients' oral health care needs. Accordingly, the CoP led a knowledge-to-action initiative that involved a seven-part webinar series meant to transfer step-by-step, skill-based knowledge through live and archived webinars. Although the core planning team functioned effectively to develop the webinars, the CoP was challenged by organizational and long-term care sector cultures, as well as governmental structures within the broader health context.

conclusionThe provincial CoP functioned as an incubator that brought together best practices, research, experiences, a reflective learning cycle, and passionate champions. Nevertheless, the CoP's efforts to stimulate practice changes were met with broader resistance. Research about how to use CoPs to influence health systems change is needed given that CoPs are being tasked with this goal.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDelivery of Health CareHealth Services for the AgedHealth Services ResearchInformation DisseminationProfessional PracticeTranslational Research, BiomedicalCommunity Health ServicesHealth PersonnelHumansKnowledgeLearningLong-Term CareOntarioOrganizational CultureResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID26208500
PMCPMC4515005
OpenAlexW1769468240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.