ArticlePloS one2015
Improved Methods to Generate Spheroid Cultures from Tumor Cells, Tumor Cells & Fibroblasts or Tumor-Fragments: Microenvironment, Microvesicles and MiRNA.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D In Vitro Models of Breast Cancer: Current Challenges and Future Prospects Toward Recapitulating the Microenvironment and Mimicking Key Processes.Advanced biology · 2025Review
- Low-cost robotic manipulation of live microtissues for cancer drug testing.Science advances · 2025Article
- Recent studies of the effects of microgravity on cancer cells and the development of 3D multicellular cancer spheroids.Stem cells translational medicine · 2025Review
- TGF-β Signaling Loop in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Activates Fibroblasts and Increases Tumor Cell Aggressiveness.Cancers · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Modulation of Microvasculature in Microdissected Tumors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Label-free, real-time monitoring of cytochrome C drug responses in microdissected tumor biopsies with a multi-well aptasensor platform.Science advances · 2024Article
- Drug testing of monodisperse arrays of live microdissected tumors using a valved multiwell microfluidic platform.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
- Harnessing three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models for pulmonary infections: State of the art and future directions.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023Review
- Biological analyses of the effects of TiO2 and PEG-b-PLA nanoparticles on three-dimensional spheroid-based tumor.Physiological research · 2023Article
- Article
- Tumor Spheroids as Model to Design Acoustically Mediated Drug Therapies: A Review.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Metabolic flux analysis of 3D spheroids reveals significant differences in glucose metabolism from matched 2D cultures of colorectal cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell lines.Cancer & metabolism · 2022Article
- Review
- The Role of Biomimetic Hypoxia on Cancer Cell Behaviour in 3D Models: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- Modeling neoplastic disease with spheroids and organoids.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2020Review
- Tunneling nanotubes: A bridge for heterogeneity in glioblastoma and a new therapeutic target?Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2019Review
- Artificial microenvironment of in vitro glioblastoma cell cultures changes profile of miRNAs related to tumor drug resistance.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Article
- A cell-loss-free concave microwell array based size-controlled multi-cellular tumoroid generation for anti-cancer drug screening.PloS one · 2019Article
- Hydrogel microenvironments for cancer spheroid growth and drug screening.Science advances · 2018Review
- Analysis of radiation effects in two irradiated tumor spheroid models.Oncology letters · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnostic and prognostic indicators are key components to achieve the goal of personalized cancer therapy. Two distinct approaches to this goal include predicting response by genetic analysis and direct testing of possible therapies using cultures derived from biopsy specimens. Optimally, the latter method requires a rapid assessment, but growing xenograft tumors or developing patient-derived cell lines can involve a great deal of time and expense. Furthermore, tumor cells have much different responses when grown in 2D versus 3D tissue environments. Using a modification of existing methods, we show that it is possible to make tumor-fragment (TF) spheroids in only 2-3 days. TF spheroids appear to closely model characteristics of the original tumor and may be used to assess critical therapy-modulating features of the microenvironment such as hypoxia. A similar method allows the reproducible development of spheroids from mixed tumor cells and fibroblasts (mixed-cell spheroids). Prior literature reports have shown highly variable development and properties of mixed-cell spheroids and this has hampered the detailed study of how individual tumor-cell components interact. In this study, we illustrate this approach and describe similarities and differences using two tumor models (U87 glioma and SQ20B squamous-cell carcinoma) with supporting data from additional cell lines. We show that U87 and SQ20B spheroids predict a key microenvironmental factor in tumors (hypoxia) and that SQ20B cells and spheroids generate similar numbers of microvesicles. We also present pilot data for miRNA expression under conditions of cells, tumors, and TF spheroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.