Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26208119›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Systematic Aβ Analysis in Drosophila Reveals High Toxicity for the 1-42, 3-42 and 11-42 Peptides, and Emphasizes N- and C-Terminal Residues.

Maria Jonson, Malgorzata Pokrzywa, Annika Starkenberg, Per Hammarstrom, Stefan Thor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring Aβ Proteotoxicity and Therapeutic Candidates UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Short Aβ peptides attenuate Aβ42 toxicity in vivo.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria JonsonDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linkoping University, SE-581 83, Linkoping, Sweden.
Malgorzata PokrzywaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping University, SE-581 85, Linkoping, Sweden.
Annika StarkenbergDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping University, SE-581 85, Linkoping, Sweden.
Per HammarstromDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linkoping University, SE-581 83, Linkoping, Sweden.
Stefan ThorDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping University, SE-581 85, Linkoping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain amyloid plaques are a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and primarily consist of aggregated Aβ peptides. While Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 are the most abundant, a number of other Aβ peptides have also been identified. Studies have indicated differential toxicity for these various Aβ peptides, but in vivo toxicity has not been systematically tested. To address this issue, we generated improved transgenic Drosophila UAS strains expressing 11 pertinent Aβ peptides. UAS transgenic flies were generated by identical chromosomal insertion, hence removing any transgenic position effects, and crossed to a novel and robust Gal4 driver line. Using this improved Gal4/UAS set-up, survival and activity assays revealed that Aβ 1-42 severely shortens lifespan and reduces activity. N-terminal truncated peptides were quite toxic, with 3-42 similar to 1-42, while 11-42 showed a pronounced but less severe phenotype. N-terminal mutations in 3-42 (E3A) or 11-42 (E11A) resulted in reduced toxicity for 11-42, and reduced aggregation for both variants. Strikingly, C-terminal truncation of Aβ (1-41, -40, -39, -38, -37) were non-toxic. In contrast, C-terminal extension to 1-43 resulted in reduced lifespan and activity, but not to the same extent as 1-42. Mutating residue 42 in 1-42 (A42D, A42R and A42W) greatly reduced Aβ accumulation and toxicity. Histological and biochemical analysis revealed strong correlation between in vivo toxicity and brain Aβ aggregate load, as well as amount of insoluble Aβ. This systematic Drosophila in vivo and in vitro analysis reveals crucial N- and C-terminal specificity for Aβ neurotoxicity and aggregation, and underscores the importance of residues 1-10 and E11, as well as a pivotal role of A42.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene ExpressionGenotypeLocomotionMolecular Sequence DataProtein Aggregation, PathologicalProtein Sorting SignalsSolubilityTranscription FactorsAmyloid beta-PeptidesDrosophila ProteinsGAL4 protein, DrosophilaProtein Sorting SignalsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26208119
PMCPMC4514787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.