ArticlePloS one2015
Medical Specialty Choice and Related Factors of Brazilian Medical Students and Recent Doctors.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing subspecialty choice among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- "Probably one of medicine's best kept secrets": preliminary qualitative insights into motivations and concerns regarding addiction medicine specialisation in Australasia.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Career Interest in Emergency Medicine among Postgraduate Interns of the University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Specialty preferences among Nigerian medical students: a cross sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Can they blame it on the final? How does medical final exam and other factors shape specialty choice?BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Factors influencing choice of residency program among medical intern doctors and medical students: a cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The complex interplay of personal and external factors in medical students' specialty decision-making: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Prevalence of burnout syndrome in Brazilian anesthesiologists during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2025Observational
- Specialty choices among new generation of doctors - insights from a Polish survey study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Factors Influencing Specialty and Training Center Choices Among Saudi Medical Residents.Cureus · 2023Article
- Ophthalmology as a career choice among medical students in Eastern India - A cross-sectional study.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Determining Factors Influencing Specialty Preferences of Iranian Medical Doctors: A Qualitative Study.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- What do Iranian physicians value most when choosing a specialty? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2022Article
- Medical students' attitudes towards and views of general practice careers in Singapore: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative analysis.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Virtual Reality Simulator Use Stimulates Medical Students' Interest in Orthopaedic Surgery.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- A thematic network for factors affecting the choice of specialty education by medical students: a scoping study in low-and middle-income countries.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- A National Survey on the characteristics of Iranian General Practitioners and Their Preferred Specialty: A Need to Transition toward Preventive Medicine.International journal of preventive medicine · 2021Article
- Factors influencing medical students' choice of specialization: A gender based systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2020Article
- American Society of Clinical Oncology-Sponsored Oncology Student Interest Groups in Latin America.JCO global oncology · 2020Article
- The role of private education in the selection of primary care careers in low and middle-income countries. Findings from a representative survey of medical residents in Brazil.Human resources for health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChoosing a medical specialty is an important, complex, and not fully understood process. The present study investigated the factors that are related to choosing and rejecting medical specialties in a group of students and recent medical doctors. METHODOLOGY AND
findingsA cross-sectional survey of 1,223 medical students and doctors was performed in Brazil in 2012. A standardized literature-based questionnaire was applied that gathered preferable or rejected specialties, and asked questions about extracurricular experiences and the influence of 14 factors on a Likert-type scale from 0 to 4. Specialties were grouped according to lifestyle categories: controllable and uncontrollable, which were subdivided into primary care, internal medicine, and surgical specialties. Notably, the time period of rejection was usually earlier than the time period of intended choice (p < 0.0001, χ(2) = 107.2). The choice mainly occurred during the internship period in medical school (n = 466; 38.7%). An overall large frequency of participation in extracurricular activities was observed (n = 1,184; 95.8%), which were highly associated with the respective medical area. Orthopedic surgery had the highest correlation with participation in specialty-specific organized groups (OR = 59.9, 95% CI = 21.6-166.3) and psychiatry was correlated with participation in research groups (OR = 18.0, 95% CI = 9.0-36.2). With regard to influential factors in controllable lifestyle specialties, "financial reason" (mean score ± standard deviation: 2.8 ± 1.0; median = 3) and "personal time" (3.1 ± 1.3; median = 4) were important factors. In primary care, these factors were less important (1.7 ± 1.3 and 1.7 ± 1.5, respectively; median = 2 for both), and higher scores were observed for "curricular internship" (3.2 ± 1.1, median = 4) and "social commitment" (2.6 ± 1.3, median = 3).
conclusionThe present findings provide important insights into developing strategies to stimulate interest in specialties based on the needs of the Brazilian healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.