ArticlePloS one2015
Generation and Characterization of Novel Magnetic Field-Responsive Biomaterials.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering the Immune Response to Biomaterials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Analysis of the Effect of Human Type I Collagen-Derived Peptide on Bone Regenerative Capacity and Comparison with Various Collagen Materials In Vivo.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Alginate Hydrogels Reinforced by Dehydration under Stress-Application to a Soft Magnetic Actuator.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Usefulness of a Nanostructured Fibrin-Agarose Bone Substitute in a Model of Severely Critical Mandible Bone Defect.Polymers · 2021Article
- Echogenic Advantages of Ferrogels Filled with Magnetic Sub-Microparticles.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Role of particle clusters on the rheology of magneto-polymer fluids and gels.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020Article
- Rheology of magnetic colloids containing clusters of particle platelets and polymer nanofibres.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020Article
- Ferrogels Ultrasonography for Biomedical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Anisotropic magnetic hydrogels: design, structure and mechanical properties.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019Article
- Mechanical properties of magnetic gels containing rod-like composite particles.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019Article
- Article
- The Contribution of Magnetic Nanoparticles to Ferrogel Biophysical Properties.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Shear Elasticity of Magnetic Gels with Internal Structures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Novel potential scaffold for periodontal tissue engineering.Clinical oral investigations · 2017Article
- Encapsulation of human elastic cartilage-derived chondrocytes in nanostructured fibrin-agarose hydrogels.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2017Article
- Bioactive Polymeric Nanoparticles for Periodontal Therapy.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the preparation of novel magnetic field-responsive tissue substitutes based on biocompatible multi-domain magnetic particles dispersed in a fibrin-agarose biopolymer scaffold. We characterized our biomaterials with several experimental techniques. First we analyzed their microstructure and found that it was strongly affected by the presence of magnetic particles, especially when a magnetic field was applied at the start of polymer gelation. In these samples we observed parallel stripes consisting of closely packed fibers, separated by more isotropic net-like spaces. We then studied the viability of oral mucosa fibroblasts in the magnetic scaffolds and found no significant differences compared to positive control samples. Finally, we analyzed the magnetic and mechanical properties of the tissue substitutes. Differences in microstructural patterns of the tissue substitutes correlated with their macroscopic mechanical properties. We also found that the mechanical properties of our magnetic tissue substitutes could be reversibly tuned by noncontact magnetic forces. This unique advantage with respect to other biomaterials could be used to match the mechanical properties of the tissue substitutes to those of potential target tissues in tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.