Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26207380›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Cholangiocarcinoma: Correlation between Molecular Profiling and Imaging Phenotypes.

Eran Sadot, Amber L Simpson, Richard K G Do, Mithat Gonen, Jinru Shia, Peter J Allen, Michael I D'Angelica, Ronald P DeMatteo, T Peter Kingham, William R Jarnagin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecular Profile of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Radiomics in immuno-oncology.Immuno-oncology technology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Outcomes assessment in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using qualitative and quantitative imaging features.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eran SadotDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Amber L SimpsonDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Richard K G DoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Mithat GonenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Jinru ShiaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Peter J AllenDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Michael I D'AngelicaDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Ronald P DeMatteoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
T Peter KinghamDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
William R JarnaginDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate associations between imaging features of cholangiocarcinoma by visual assessment and texture analysis, which quantifies heterogeneity in tumor enhancement patterns, with molecular profiles based on hypoxia markers.

methodsThe institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study of CT images of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, obtained before surgery. Immunostaining for hypoxia markers (EGFR, VEGF, CD24, P53, MDM2, MRP-1, HIF-1α, CA-IX, and GLUT1) was performed on pre-treatment liver biopsies. Quantitative imaging phenotypes were determined by texture analysis with gray level co-occurrence matrixes. The correlations between quantitative imaging phenotypes, qualitative imaging features (measured by radiographic inspection alone), and expression levels of the hypoxia markers from the 25 tumors were assessed.

resultsTwenty-five patients were included with a median age of 62 years (range: 54-84). The median tumor size was 10.2 cm (range: 4-14), 10 (40%) were single tumors, and 90% were moderately differentiated. Positive immunostaining was recorded for VEGF in 67% of the cases, EGFR in 75%, and CD24 in 55%. On multiple linear regression analysis, quantitative imaging phenotypes correlated significantly with EGFR and VEGF expression levels (R2 = 0.4, p<0.05 and R2 = 0.2, p<0.05, respectively), while a trend was demonstrated with CD24 expression (R2 = 0.33, p = 0.1). Three qualitative imaging features correlated with VEGF and CD24 expression (P<0.05), however, none of the qualitative features correlated with the quantitative imaging phenotypes.

conclusionQuantitative imaging phenotypes, as defined by texture analysis, correlated with expression of specific markers of hypoxia, regardless of conventional imaging features.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCholangiocarcinomaClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMicroarray AnalysisMiddle AgedPhenotypePrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26207380
PMCPMC4514866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.