Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26207355›Full record

ArticleMicroscopy research and technique2015

IV and IP administration of rhodamine in visualization of WBC-BBB interactions in cerebral vessels.

Zachary Wilmer Reichenbach, Hongbo Li, John P Gaughan, Melanie Elliott, Ronald Tuma

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microscopy research and technique, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Antibody-basedNeurophotonics · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary Wilmer ReichenbachTemple University School of Medicine, Center for Sustance Abuse Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140.
Hongbo LiTemple University School of Medicine, Center for Sustance Abuse Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140.
John P GaughanTemple University School of Medicine, Biostatistics Consulting Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140.
Melanie ElliottDepartment Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107.
Ronald TumaTemple University School of Medicine, Center for Sustance Abuse Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140.
Temple University · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM: DRUGS OF ABUSE RELATED NEUROPEPTIDEST32DA007237 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ELLEN M UNTERWALD · 1988 to 2026
$10.6M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epi-illuminescence intravital fluorescence microscopy has been employed to study leukocyte-endothelial interactions in a number of brain pathologies. Historically, dyes such as Rhodamine 6G have been injected intravenously. However, intravenous injections can predispose experimental animals to a multitude of complications and requires a high degree of technical skill. Here, we study the efficacy of injecting Rhodamine 6G into the peritoneum (IP) for the purpose of analyzing leukocyte-endothelial interactions through a cranial window during real time intravital microscopy. After examining the number of rolling and adherent leukocytes through a cranial window, we found no advantage to the intravenous injection (IV). Additionally, we tested blood from both routes of injection by flow cytometry to gain a very precise picture of the two methods. The two routes of administration failed to show any difference in the ability to detect cells. The study supports the notion that IP Rhodamine 6G works as efficaciously as IV and should be considered a viable alternative in experimental design for investigations employing intravital microscopy. Facilitated intravital studies will allow for more exploration into cerebral pathologies and allow for more rapid translation from the laboratory to the patient with less chance of experimental error from failed IV access.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnimalsBlood VesselsBrainEndothelial CellsInjections, IntraperitonealLeukocytesMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopyOptical ImagingRhodaminesStaining and LabelingRhodaminescranial windowepi-illuminescence intravital fluorescence microscopyintraperitoneal injectionleukocyte adhesionleukocyte rollingrhodamine 6G

Identifiers

PMID26207355
PMCPMC4581919
OpenAlexW1517197062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.