Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26207303›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2015

Using Flickering Light to Enhance Nonimage-Forming Visual Stimulation in Humans.

Garen V Vartanian, Xiwu Zhao, Kwoon Y Wong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Kinetic pupillary size using Pentacam in myopia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Circadian phase-shifting by light: Beyond photons.Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms · 2018
    Article
  8. Melanopsin- and L-cone-induced pupil constriction is inhibited by S- and M-cones in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Garen V VartanianDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States 2Graduate Program in Macromolecular Science & Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Xiwu ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Kwoon Y WongDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States 3Department of Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Michigan United · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

VIVARIUM MODULEP30EY007003 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Antonetti · 1987 to 2026
$17.6M
Vision Research Training Program - T32EY013934T32EY013934 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Patrice Elie Fort · 2002 to 2026
$4.2M
E75 IN THE DEVELOPING DROSOPHILA EYEF31EY007003 · NEI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHILTON, ALYCIA N · 1999 to 2001
$14k
NEI NIH HHS EY007003NEI NIH HHS EY013934NEI NIH HHS F31 EY007003NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007003NEI NIH HHS T32 EY013934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) mediate nonimage-forming visual functions such as pupillary constriction and circadian photoentrainment. Optimizing daytime nonimage-forming photostimulation has health benefits. We aimed to enhance ipRGC excitation using flickering instead of steady light.

methodsHuman subjects were tested with a three-dimensional matrix of flickering 463-nm stimuli: three photon counts (13.7, 14.7 and 15.7 log photons cm(-2)), three duty cycles (12%, 47%, and 93%) and seven flicker frequencies (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 7 Hz). Steady-state pupil constrictions were measured.

resultsAmong stimuli containing 13.7 log photons cm-2, the one flickering at 2 Hz with a 12% duty cycle evoked the greatest pupil constriction of 48% ± 4%, 71% greater than that evoked by an equal-intensity (12.3 log photons cm(-2) s(-1)) continuous light. This frequency and duty cycle were also best for 14.7 log photons cm-2 stimuli, inducing a 58% ± 4% constriction which was 38% more than that caused by an equal-intensity (13.3 log photons cm(-2) s(-1)) constant light. For 15.7 log photons cm-2 stimuli, the 1-Hz, 47% duty cycle flicker was optimal although it evoked the same constriction as the best 14.7 log photons cm(-2) flicker.

conclusionsPupillary constriction depends on flicker frequency and duty cycle besides intensity. Among the stimuli tested, the one with the lowest photon count inducing a maximal response is 13.3 log photons cm(-2) s(-1) flickering at 2 Hz with 12% duty cycle. Our data could guide the design of healthier architectural lighting and better phototherapy devices for treating seasonal affective disorder and jet lag.

Indexed as

LightAdultAnimalsDark AdaptationElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMicePhotic StimulationPupilRetinal Ganglion CellsRod OpsinsVision, OcularYoung AdultRod Opsins

Identifiers

PMID26207303
PMCPMC4516013
OpenAlexW2419058803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.