ArticleComparative cognition & behavior reviews
Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.
Article in Comparative cognition & behavior reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perception of optical illusions in ungulates: insights from goats, sheep, guanacos and llamas.Animal cognition · 2024Article
- Towards describing scenes by animals: Pigeons' ordinal discrimination of objects varying in depth.Learning & behavior · 2021Article
- Pigeons process actor-action configurations more readily than bystander-action configurations.Learning & behavior · 2020Article
- Pigeons integrate visual motion signals differently than humans.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Pigeons simultaneously attend to static and dynamic features of complex displays.Behavioural processes · 2019Article
- Serial pattern learning in pigeons: Rule-based or associative?Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2017Article
- Complex conditional control by pigeons in a continuous virtual environment.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2016Article
- Temporal dynamics of task switching and abstract-concept learning in pigeons.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
- Comparative Psychology: A Perspective Rather than a Discipline. Commentary: A Crisis in Comparative Psychology: Where Have All the Undergraduates Gone?Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The comparative analysis of visual cognition across classes of animals yields important information regarding underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms involved with this foundational aspect of behavior. Birds, and pigeons specifically, have been an important source and model for this comparison, especially in relation to mammals. During these investigations, an extensive number of experiments have found divergent results in how pigeons and humans process visual information. Four areas of these divergences are collected, reviewed, and analyzed. We examine the potential contribution and limitations of experimental, spatial, and attentional factors in the interpretation of these findings and their implications for mechanisms of visual cognition in birds and mammals. Recommendations are made to help advance these comparisons in service of understanding the general principles by which different classes and species generate representations of the visual world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.