ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2015
Precision medicine: Look to the mice.
Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenolic-enabled nanotechnology: a new strategy for central nervous system disease therapy.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2024Review
- Uses for humanised mouse models in precision medicine for neurodegenerative disease.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2019Review
- Predicting human disease mutations and identifying drug targets from mouse gene knockout phenotyping campaigns.Disease models & mechanisms · 2019Review
- Recommended housing densities for research mice: filling the gap in data-driven alternatives.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019Review
- The old and new face of craniofacial research: How animal models inform human craniofacial genetic and clinical data.Developmental biology · 2016Review
- Recent Advances of Light-Mediated Theranostics.Theranostics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.