Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26206897›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2015

A large-scale prospective registration study of the safety and efficacy of sorafenib tosylate in unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan: results of over 3200 consecutive cases in post-marketing all-patient surveillance.

Hideyuki Akaza, Mototsugu Oya, Masafumi Iijima, Ichinosuke Hyodo, Akihiko Gemma, Hiroshi Itoh, Masatoshi Adachi, Yutaka Okayama, Toshiyuki Sunaya, Lyo Inuyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hideyuki AkazaDepartment of Strategic Investigation on Comprehensive Cancer Network, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies/Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Information Studies, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo akazah@med.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Mototsugu OyaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo.
Masafumi IijimaShowa University School of Medicine, Tokyo.
Ichinosuke HyodoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki.
Akihiko GemmaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine/Infection and Oncology, Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo.
Hiroshi ItohDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo.
Masatoshi AdachiMedical Affairs Oncology and Hematology, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Osaka.
Yutaka OkayamaPharmacovigilance, Medical Affairs, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Osaka.
Toshiyuki SunayaClinical Statistics, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Lyo InuyamaPharmacovigilance, Medical Affairs, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Osaka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReal-life safety and efficacy of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma in a nationwide patient population were evaluated by post-marketing all-patient surveillance.

methodsAll patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan who started sorafenib therapy from February 2008 to September 2009 were registered and followed for up to 12 months. Baseline characteristics, treatment status, tumor response, survival and safety data were recorded by the prescribing physicians.

resultsSafety and efficacy were evaluated in 3255 and 3171 patients, respectively. The initial daily dose was 800 mg in 78.2% of patients. Median duration of treatment was 6.7 months and the mean relative dose intensity was 68.4%. Overall, 2227 patients (68.4%) discontinued the treatment by 12 months, half of which (52.0% of discontinued patients) were due to adverse events. The most common adverse drug reactions were hand-foot skin reaction (59%), hypertension (36%), rash (25%) and increase in lipase/amylase (23%). The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence intervals: 6.7-8.1), and the overall survival rate at 1 year was 75.4% (73.5-77.1). Prognostic factors for overall survival were mostly consistent with those in previous clinical trials in the univariate analysis and largely similar to those for progression-free survival and duration of treatment in the multivariate analysis.

conclusionsSorafenib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma under the labeled dose was feasible in daily medical practice, for its acceptable toxicity profile and favorable clinical benefit that were consistent with those in clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease-Free SurvivalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansJapanKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProspective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSorafenibmolecularly targeted therapypost-marketing surveillancerenal cell carcinomasorafenib tosylate

Identifiers

PMID26206897
PMCPMC4598240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.