SynthesisEndocrine2015
TITF1 and TITF2 loci variants indicate significant associations with thyroid cancer.
Synthesis in Endocrine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- rs965513 polymorphism as a common risk marker is associated with papillary thyroid cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Article
- Association of rs944289, rs965513, and rs1443434 in TITF1/TITF2 with Risks of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma and with Nodular Goiter in Northern Chinese Han Populations.International journal of endocrinology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of studies have investigated the influence of TITF1 and TITF2 genetic variants on thyroid carcinogenesis, but their associations remain unclear due to the controversial results. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that TITF1 and TITF2 variants modulate thyroid cancer susceptibility. Eligible studies were identified through online searches supplemented by manual search. Either the DerSimonian and Laird method or the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to estimate the risk of thyroid cancer (ORs and 95 % CIs). The pooled ORs were calculated assuming the allele model. We identified a total of 10 publications concerning the topic of interest. Overall, meta-analysis of rs944289 showed 1.11-fold increased risk of thyroid cancer related to the risk T allele (T vs. C: OR 1.11, 95 % CI 1.05-1.17). For rs965513, individuals carrying the risk A allele, compared to individuals with the G allele, had 31 % higher risk of thyroid cancer (A vs. G: OR 1.31, 95 % CI 1.17-1.46). Analyses in total samples for rs1867277, rs1443434, and rs907580 yielded similar associations (A vs. G: OR 1.22, 95 % CI 1.06-1.39; G vs. T: OR 1.26, 95 % CI 1.09-1.45; T vs. C: OR 1.42, 95 % CI 1.21-1.66, respectively). The significant association persisted among Caucasians in subgroup analyses for rs944289 and rs965513. The genetic susceptibility of thyroid cancer seems likely to be associated with the risk allele at rs944289 in the TITF1 gene and at rs1867277, rs965513, rs1443434, and rs907580 in the TITF2 gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.