Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26206679›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2016

Predicting Knee Osteoarthritis.

Bruce S Gardiner, Francis G Woodhouse, Thor F Besier, Alan J Grodzinsky, David G Lloyd, Lihai Zhang, David W Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Computational Modelling for Managing Pathways to Cartilage Failure.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AnFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Acacetin Suppresses IL-1BioMed research international · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Bruce S GardinerSchool of Engineering and Information Technology, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Francis G WoodhouseFaculty of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia. francis.woodhouse@uwa.edu.au.
Thor F BesierDepartment of Engineering Science, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Alan J GrodzinskyDepartments of Biological Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science & Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
David G LloydCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Lihai ZhangDepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David W SmithFaculty of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
University of Western Australia · AUGriffith University · AUMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USMurdoch University · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment options for osteoarthritis (OA) beyond pain relief or total knee replacement are very limited. Because of this, attention has shifted to identifying which factors increase the risk of OA in vulnerable populations in order to be able to give recommendations to delay disease onset or to slow disease progression. The gold standard is then to use principles of risk management, first to provide subject-specific estimates of risk and then to find ways of reducing that risk. Population studies of OA risk based on statistical associations do not provide such individually tailored information. Here we argue that mechanistic models of cartilage tissue maintenance and damage coupled to statistical models incorporating model uncertainty, united within the framework of structural reliability analysis, provide an avenue for bridging the disciplines of epidemiology, cell biology, genetics and biomechanics. Such models promise subject-specific OA risk assessment and personalized strategies for mitigating or even avoiding OA. We illustrate the proposed approach with a simple model of cartilage extracellular matrix synthesis and loss regulated by daily physical activity.

Indexed as

CartilageExtracellular MatrixModels, BiologicalOsteoarthritis, KneeFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentBiomechanical modelingCartilage degenerationExtracellular matrixStructural reliability analysisSubject-specific risk prediction

Identifiers

PMID26206679
PMCPMC4690844
OpenAlexW1026203253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.