Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26206487›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmacology2015

Mutational Analysis of the Putative High-Affinity Propofol Binding Site in Human β3 Homomeric GABAA Receptors.

Megan M Eaton, Lily Q Cao, Ziwei Chen, Nicholas P Franks, Alex S Evers, Gustav Akk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Activation of the human β3 GABABiochemical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phenols and GABAFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. GABAJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of GABAMolecular pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison of αβδ and αβγ GABAPharmacological research · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Megan M EatonDepartment of Anesthesiology (M.M.E., L.Q.C., Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.) and the Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research (Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, United Kingdom (N.P.F.).
Lily Q CaoDepartment of Anesthesiology (M.M.E., L.Q.C., Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.) and the Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research (Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, United Kingdom (N.P.F.).
Ziwei ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology (M.M.E., L.Q.C., Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.) and the Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research (Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, United Kingdom (N.P.F.).
Nicholas P FranksDepartment of Anesthesiology (M.M.E., L.Q.C., Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.) and the Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research (Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, United Kingdom (N.P.F.).
Alex S EversDepartment of Anesthesiology (M.M.E., L.Q.C., Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.) and the Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research (Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, United Kingdom (N.P.F.).
Gustav AkkDepartment of Anesthesiology (M.M.E., L.Q.C., Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.) and the Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research (Z.C., A.S.E., G.A.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, United Kingdom (N.P.F.) akk@morpheus.wustl.edu.
Anna Needs Neuroblastoma Answers · USImperial College London · GBTaylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research

Funding

MOLECULAR SITES OF NEUROSTEROID BINDINGR01GM108799 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVERS, ALEX S. · 2014 to 2022
$4.0M
SYNERGISTIC ACTIONS OF INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETICSR01GM108580 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AKK, GUSTAV · 2014 to 2021
$2.4M
Medical Research Council G0501584Medical Research Council G0901892NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108580NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM108580NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108799NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM108799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Propofol is a sedative and anesthetic agent that can both activate GABA(A) receptors and potentiate receptor activation elicited by submaximal concentrations of the transmitter. A recent modeling study of the β3 homomeric GABA(A) receptor postulated a high-affinity propofol binding site in a hydrophobic pocket in the middle of a triangular cleft lined by the M1 and M2 membrane-spanning domains of one subunit and the M2 domain of the neighboring subunit. The goal of the present study was to gain functional evidence for the involvement of this pocket in the actions of propofol. Human β3 and α1β3 receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes, and the effects of substitutions of selected residues were probed on channel activation by propofol and pentobarbital. The data demonstrate the vital role of the β3(Y143), β3(F221), β3(Q224), and β3(T266) residues in the actions of propofol but not pentobarbital in β3 receptors. The effects of β3(Y143W) and β3(Q224W) on activation by propofol are likely steric because propofol analogs with less bulky ortho substituents activated both wild-type and mutant receptors. The T266W mutation removed activation by propofol in β3 homomeric receptors; however, this mutation alone or in combination with a homologous mutation (I271W) in the α1 subunit had almost no effect on activation properties in α1β3 heteromeric receptors. We hypothesize that heteromeric α1β3 receptors can be activated by propofol interactions with β3-β3, α1-β3, and β3-α1 interfaces, but the exact locations of the binding site and/or nature of interactions vary in different classes of interfaces.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesDNA Mutational AnalysisDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMutationPropofolProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptors, GABA-AXenopus laevisGABRB3 protein, humanPropofolReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID26206487
PMCPMC4576687
OpenAlexW2123528614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.