Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26206163›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2015

Intersphincteric approach for rectourethral fistulas following radical prostatectomy.

A Amato, G Pellino, P Secondo, F Selvaggi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rectourethral Fistula Management.Current urology reports · 2016
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A AmatoColoproctology Unit, Department of Surgery, Sanremo, Italy.
G PellinoUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Second University of Naples, Via F. Giordani 42, 80122, Naples, Italy.
P SecondoColoproctology Unit, Department of Surgery, Sanremo, Italy.
F SelvaggiUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Second University of Naples, Via F. Giordani 42, 80122, Naples, Italy. fselvaggi@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-3797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectourethral fistula is a challenging complication of radical retropubic prostatectomy. Several treatments have been proposed, with varying outcomes. The available data are difficult to interpret, because patient and disease characteristics differ significantly among reports. Details of long-term follow-up and functional status are rarely provided. We describe a technique of rectourethral fistula repair via an intersphincteric route.

methodsPreoperative workup included proctoscopy and urethrocystography. All patients already had a stoma at the time of fistula repair. Mechanical cleansing of the bowel distal to the colostomy was routinely performed, and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was administered. Patients were placed in the lithotomy position. Under spinal anesthesia, a curvilinear anteanal incision was made, to expose the external sphincter. The anterior portion of the external sphincter was gently displaced along half of its circumference. The anterior rectal wall was sharply dissected free from the urethra, approximately up to 2 cm above the fistula level through the intersphincteric plane. The fistula was identified. The surrounding tissues were mobilized to obtain a tension-free repair of the urethral defect, using a single row of 4-0 polyglactin transverse, interrupted sutures. Transanally, a U-shaped full-thickness rectal flap was advanced and sutured with 3-0 monofilament interrupted sutures to cover the rectal opening, and care was taken to ensure that the two suture lines were in different planes. The catheter was left in place for 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated at 3-month follow-up for stoma closure.

resultsWe successfully treated five patients. Only one minor complication was observed (surgical site infection). Stomas were taken down uneventfully. After a median follow-up duration of 2 years (range 2-3 years), no patients had fistula recurrence or impaired continence.

conclusionsIntersphincteric repair should be considered as an effective option in patients with iatrogenic rectourethral fistulas. This technique offers several advantages over alternative procedures that require more extensive approaches or invasive manipulation of the anal sphincters.

Indexed as

AgedAnal CanalAntibiotic ProphylaxisColostomyHumansMalePatient PositioningPreoperative CareProstateProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRectal FistulaRectumSurgical FlapsSuture TechniquesUrethraAnorectalFistulaIntersphinctericRectourethral fistulaRepair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.