ArticleBritish dental journal2015
Consent - a new era begins.
Article in British dental journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Quality of available internet information regarding IV sedation for dental treatment.British dental journal · 2020Article
- The future of failure to warn in dentistry after Montgomery: reflections from Australia.British dental journal · 2018Article
- Consent - an update.British dental journal · 2017Article
- Pharmaceuticals: Antibiotics and vegetarians.British dental journal · 2016Article
- Restorative complications of orthodontic treatment.British dental journal · 2016Article
- Lower third molar surgery - consent and coronectomy.British dental journal · 2016Article
- Differentiating success from survival in modern implantology--key considerations for case selection, predicting complications and obtaining consent.British dental journal · 2016Review
- A quality assessment of orthodontic patient information leaflets.Progress in orthodontics · 2016Article
- Consent down under.British dental journal · 2015Article
- Ethics: Assessing 'material risk' and 'values'.British dental journal · 2015Article
- Embracing Medication Needs of Patients based on Ethical, Dietary, and Religious Preferences.American journal of lifestyle medicineReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The law in relation to consent has changed following the handing down of the Supreme Court judgement in Montgomery vs Lanarkshire in March this year. Legally, clinicians, including dentists, must now take reasonable care to ensure that patients are aware of any material risks involved in a proposed treatment and of reasonable alternatives. This case now brings the law in relation to the disclosure of risks when obtaining consent to treatment in line with the guidance issued by regulatory bodies such as the GMC and GDC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26205928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.