Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26205718›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2016

RhoA-Mediated Functions in C3H10T1/2 Osteoprogenitors Are Substrate Topography Dependent.

Yoichiro Ogino, Ruiwei Liang, Daniela B S Mendonça, Gustavo Mendonça, Masako Nagasawa, Kiyoshi Koyano, Lyndon F Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoichiro OginoDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ruiwei LiangDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Daniela B S MendonçaDivision of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Gustavo MendonçaDivision of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Masako NagasawaDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kiyoshi KoyanoDivision of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Lyndon F CooperDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

Training Program for the Next Generation of Oral Health Researches (NextGen)R90DE022527 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EVERETT, ERIC T. · 2011 to 2016
$672k
NIDCR NIH HHS R90 DE022527NIDCR NIH HHS R90DE022527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface topography broadly influences cellular responses. Adherent cell activities are regulated, in part, by RhoA, a member of the Rho-family of GTPases. In this study, we evaluated the influence of surface topography on RhoA activity and associated cellular functions. The murine mesenchymal stem cell line C3H10T1/2 cells (osteoprogenitor cells) were cultured on titanium substrates with smooth topography (S), microtopography (M), and nanotopography (N) to evaluate the effect of surface topography on RhoA-mediated functions (cell spreading, adhesion, migration, and osteogenic differentiation). The influence of RhoA activity in the context of surface topography was also elucidated using RhoA pharmacologic inhibitor. Following adhesion, M and N adherent cells developed multiple projections, while S adherent cells had flattened and widespread morphology. RhoA inhibitor induced remarkable longer and thinner cytoplasmic projections on all surfaces. Cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation was topography dependent with S < M and N surfaces. RhoA inhibition increased adhesion on S and M surfaces, but not N surfaces. Cell migration in a wound healing assay was greater on S versus M versus N surfaces and RhoA inhibitor increased S adherent cell migration, but not N adherent cell migration. RhoA inhibitor enhanced osteogenic differentiation in S adherent cells, but not M or N adherent cells. RhoA activity was surface topography roughness dependent (S < M, N). RhoA activity and -mediated functions are influenced by surface topography. Smooth surface adherent cells appear highly sensitive to RhoA function, while nano-scale topography adherent cell may utilize alternative cellular signaling pathway(s) to influence adherent cellular functions regardless of RhoA activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell LineCell MovementMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceOsteogenesisrhoA GTP-Binding Proteinrho GTP-Binding ProteinsrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinRhoA protein, mouserho GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26205718
PMCPMC4970218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.