Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26205692›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2015

Primary care nurses' performance in motivational interviewing: a quantitative descriptive study.

Ann-Sofi Östlund, Marja-Leena Kristofferzon, Elisabeth Häggström, Barbro Wadensten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ann-Sofi ÖstlundDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, BMC, Box 564, Uppsala, 751 22, Sweden. ann-sofi.ostlund@hig.se.
Marja-Leena KristofferzonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, BMC, Box 564, Uppsala, 751 22, Sweden. marja-leena.kristofferzon@hig.se.
Elisabeth HäggströmDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, BMC, Box 564, Uppsala, 751 22, Sweden. elisabeth.haggstrom@hig.se.
Barbro WadenstenDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, BMC, Box 564, Uppsala, 751 22, Sweden. barbro.wadensten@pubcare.uu.se.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotivational interviewing is a collaborative conversational style intended to strengthen motivation to change. It has been shown to be effective in addressing many different lifestyle problems as well as in chronic disease management, and many disease prevention guidelines promote use of motivational interviewing. The aim of the present study was twofold: to assess to what extent the primary care nurses in the study perform motivational interviewing according to the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code and to investigate how the participating primary care nurses rated their own performance in motivational interviewing.

methodThe study was based on twelve primary care nurses' audio-recorded motivational interviewing sessions with patients (total 32 sessions). After each session, the nurses completed a questionnaire regarding their experience of their own performance in motivational interviewing. The audio-recorded sessions were analyzed using Motivational Interviewing Integrity Code 3.1.1.

resultsNone of the nurses achieved beginning proficiency in all parts of any motivational interviewing sessions and two nurses did not achieve beginning proficiency in any parts or sessions. Making more complex than simple reflections was the specific verbal behavior/summary score that most nurses achieved. Beginning proficiency/competency in "percent open questions" was the summary score that fewest achieved.

conclusionPrimary care nurses did not achieve beginning proficiency/competency in all aspects of motivational interviewing in their recorded sessions with patients, where lifestyle change was discussed. This indicates a need for improvement and thus additional training, feedback and supervision in clinical practice with motivational interviewing.

Indexed as

Life StyleAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingNursesPrimary Health CareSelf-AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenTape Recording

Identifiers

PMID26205692
PMCPMC4513379
OpenAlexW1945229594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.