Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26205390›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics2016

The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Morus mongolica and a comparative analysis within the Fabidae clade.

Weiqing Kong, Jinhong Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The complete chloroplast genome of the Korean endemic plantMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  3. Comparative chloroplast genome analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Chloroplast Genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weiqing KongThe Key Sericultural Laboratory of Shaanxi, Ankang University, Shaanxi, 725099, China. weiqing_kongwq@126.com.
Jinhong YangThe Key Sericultural Laboratory of Shaanxi, Ankang University, Shaanxi, 725099, China.
Ankang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complete nucleotide sequence of the Morus mongolica chloroplast (cp) genome was reported and characterized in this study. The cp genome is a circular molecule of 158,459 bp containing a pair of 25,678 bp IR regions, separated by small and large single-copy regions of 19,736 and 87,363 bp, respectively. The number and relative positions of the 114 unique genes (80 PCGs, 30 tRNAs, and 4 rRNA genes) are almost identical to Morus indica cp genome. Further detailed comparative analyses revealed one hypervariable region, which is responsible for 88% of the total variation, and 64 indel events between two individuals. There are 78 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in M. mongolica cp genome, in which 58 of them are mononucleotide repeats. Comparative analysis with M. indica cp genome indicated 22 SSRs with length polymorphisms and 1 SSR with nucleotide content polymorphism. The phylogenetic analysis of 60 PCGs from 62 cp genomes provided strong support for the monophyletic, single origin of Fabidae (N2-fixing) clade.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastSequence Analysis, DNAComputational BiologyGene OrderGenetic StructuresMicrosatellite RepeatsMolecular Sequence AnnotationMorusMutationPhylogenyChloroplast genomeMorus mongolicaPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID26205390
OpenAlexW1911335323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.