Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26205379›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

A cross sectional comparison of postnatal care quality in facilities participating in a maternal health voucher program versus non-voucher facilities in Kenya.

Charlotte E Warren, Timothy Abuya, Lucy Kanya, Francis Obare, Rebecca Njuki, Marleen Temmerman, Ben Bellows

Abstract readClinical StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte E WarrenPopulation Council, 4301 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington DC, 20008, USA. cwarren@popcouncil.org.
Timothy AbuyaPopulation Council General Accident Insurance House, Ralph Bunche Road, PO Box 17643, Nairobi, 00500, Kenya. tabuya@popcouncil.org.
Lucy KanyaPopulation Council General Accident Insurance House, Ralph Bunche Road, PO Box 17643, Nairobi, 00500, Kenya. Lucy.Kanya@brunel.ac.uk.
Francis ObarePopulation Council General Accident Insurance House, Ralph Bunche Road, PO Box 17643, Nairobi, 00500, Kenya. fonyango@popcouncil.org.
Rebecca NjukiPopulation Council General Accident Insurance House, Ralph Bunche Road, PO Box 17643, Nairobi, 00500, Kenya. njuki.rebecca@gmail.com.
Marleen TemmermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pinte Laan 185, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium. Marleen.Temmerman@UGent.be.
Ben BellowsPopulation Council General Accident Insurance House, Ralph Bunche Road, PO Box 17643, Nairobi, 00500, Kenya. bbellows@popcouncil.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth service fees constitute substantial barriers for women seeking childbirth and postnatal care. In an effort to reduce health inequities, the government of Kenya in 2006 introduced the output-based approach (OBA), or voucher programme, to increase poor women's access to quality Safe Motherhood services including postnatal care. To help improve service quality, OBA programmes purchase services on behalf of the poor and marginalised, with provider reimbursements for verified services. Kenya's programme accredited health facilities in three districts as well as in two informal Nairobi settlements.

methodsPostnatal care quality in voucher health facilities (n = 21) accredited in 2006 and in similar non-voucher health facilities (n = 20) are compared with cross sectional data collected in 2010. Summary scores for quality were calculated as additive sums of specific aspects of each attribute (structure, process, outcome). Measures of effect were assessed in a linear regression model accounting for clustering at facility level. Data were analysed using Stata 11.0.

resultsThe overall quality of postnatal care is poor in voucher and non-voucher facilities, but many facilities demonstrated 'readiness' for postnatal care (structural attributes: infrastructure, equipment, supplies, staffing, training) indicated by high scores (83/111), with public voucher facilities scoring higher than public non-voucher facilities. The two groups of facilities evinced no significant differences in postnatal care mean process scores: 14.2/55 in voucher facilities versus 16.4/55 in non-voucher facilities; coefficient: -1.70 (-4.9, 1.5), p = 0.294. Significantly more newborns were seen within 48 hours (83.5% versus 72.1%: p = 0.001) and received Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) (82.5% versus 76.5%: p < 0.001) at voucher facilities than at non-voucher facilities.

conclusionsFour years after facility accreditation in Kenya, scores for postnatal care quality are low in all facilities, even those with Safe Motherhood vouchers. We recommend the Kenya OBA programme review its Safe Motherhood reimbursement package and draw lessons from supply side results-based financing initiatives, to improve postnatal care quality.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentQuality of Health CareAccreditationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth ExpendituresHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansImmunization ProgramsInfant, NewbornKenyaMaternal Health Services

Identifiers

PMID26205379
PMCPMC4513395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.