Trial reportDer Orthopade2015
[Tumours and metastases of the spine : cavity/coblation surgery and vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty].
Trial report in Der Orthopade, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- What is the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation in the management of patients with spinal metastases? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Pooled it
- When Less Is More: The indications for MIS Techniques and Separation Surgery in Metastatic Spine Disease.Spine · 2016Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadical surgery for metastases in the spine is in many cases not possible, includingthe higher risk of surgery in older patients with co-morbidities. The aims of treatment are: minimally invasive and maximally effective tumour removal, fracture position, stabilization, pain reduction, and improved quality of life. The specific features and problems of diagnosis and treatment using the cavity/coblation method, , the surgical technique, and the results of the treatment of 250 patients with spinal tumours/metastases are presented. MATERIALS AND
methodsTumour resection is carried out by plasma field, via percutaneous trans-/extrapedicular access, followed by kyphoplasty. Clinical and radiological follow-up was carried out postoperatively, including data on pain reduction and improvement of quality of life.
resultsWithin 6 years (March 2008t February 2014) a total of 250 patients, or 812 spines were treated. In 59 cases dorsal percutaneous instrumentation and straightening were carried out. Minimal blood loss and a very low complication rate were recorded. After surgery, significant pain reduction, satisfaction, early mobilization, and improvement in quality of life were demonstrated in all patients. Immediate radio- and chemotherapy could be carried out. In 38 cases cement escaped laterally into the intervertebral space, but this had no clinical relevance. 188 patients have since died because of tumour manifestations.
conclusionsThe cavity/coblation method has been demonstrated to be a safe, minimally invasive procedure, with good short- and long-term results and lower complication rates. A comprehensive diagnostic, including tumour staging, the correct indication, and prognosis estimation, is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.