Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26205344›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2015

Patients, health information, and guidelines: A focus-group study.

Helena Liira, Osmo Saarelma, Margaret Callaghan, Robin Harbour, Jukkapekka Jousimaa, Ilkka Kunnamo, Kirsty Loudon, Emma Mcfarlane, Shaun Treweek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Helena Liiraa General Practice, School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia.
Osmo Saarelmac Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd , Helsinki , Finland.
Margaret Callaghand Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, NHS Healthcare Improvement Scotland , Glasgow , Scotland.
Robin Harbourd Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, NHS Healthcare Improvement Scotland , Glasgow , Scotland.
Jukkapekka Jousimaac Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd , Helsinki , Finland.
Ilkka Kunnamob University of Helsinki, Department of General Practice , and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Unit of Primary Health Care , Helsinki , Finland.
Kirsty Loudone Division of Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee , UK.
Emma Mcfarlanef National Institute for Health and Care Excellence , Manchester , UK.
Shaun Treweekg Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen , UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based clinical guidelines could support shared decision-making and help patients to participate actively in their care. However, it is not well known how patients view guidelines as a source of health information. This qualitative study aimed to assess what patients know about guidelines, and what they think of their presentation formats. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the role of guidelines as health information for patients and how could the implementation of evidence-based information for patients be improved?

methodsA qualitative study with focus groups that were built around a semi-structured topic guide. Focus groups were audiotaped and transcribed and analysed using a phenomenographic approach.

resultsFive focus groups were carried out in 2012 with a total of 23 participants. Patients searched for health information from the Internet or consulted health professionals or their personal networks. The concepts of guidelines included instructions or standards for health professionals, information given by a health professional to the patient, and material to protect and promote the interests of patients. Some patients did not have a concept for guidelines. Patients felt that health information was abundant and its quality sometimes difficult to assess. They respected conciseness, clarity, clear structure, and specialists or well-known organizations as authors of health information. Patients would like health professionals to deliver and clarify written materials to them or point out to them the relevant Internet sites.

conclusionsThe concept of guidelines was not well known among our interviewees; however, they expressed an interest in having more communication on health information, both written information and clarifications with their health professionals.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInformation DisseminationPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationAdolescentAdultAgedConsumer Health InformationFemaleFocus GroupsHealth EducationHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchClinical guidelinesconceptsFinlandfocus groupsgeneral practicepatient informationpatient versions

Identifiers

PMID26205344
PMCPMC4750726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.