Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26205313›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2015

Social smoking among intermittent smokers.

Saul Shiffman, Xiaoxue Li, Michael S Dunbar, Stuart G Ferguson, Hilary A Tindle, Sarah M Scholl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. I am what I am: A meta-analysis of the association between substance user identities and substance use-related outcomes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saul ShiffmanSmoking Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 130 N. Bellefield Avenue, Suite 510, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: shiffman@pitt.edu.
Xiaoxue LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Michael S DunbarSmoking Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 130 N. Bellefield Avenue, Suite 510, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Stuart G FergusonSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 34, Hobart TAS 7001, Australia.
Hilary A TindleDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Sarah M SchollSmoking Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 130 N. Bellefield Avenue, Suite 510, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

Understanding Emerging Patterns of Non-Daily Smoking: Field and Lab AssessmentsR01DA020742 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHIFFMAN, SAUL · 2006 to 2010
$2.8M
EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN CANCER PREVENTIONR25CA057703 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WEISSFELD, JOEL L · 1992 to 2010
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057703NCI NIH HHS R25-CA057703-15NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020742NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA020742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background"Social smoking" - smoking mostly or even only with others - may be an important pattern that implies smoking motivated extrinsically by social influences. Non-daily smokers (intermittent smokers; ITS) are often assumed to be social smokers, with some authors even assuming that all ITS are social smokers (SS+). We sought to identify and characterize social smokers in a sample of ITS.

methods204 adult ITS (smoking 4-27 days/month) recorded the circumstances of smoking in their natural settings using Ecological Momentary Assessment, while also recording their circumstances in nonsmoking moments. SS+ were defined as ITS who were with others when they smoked most of their cigarettes, and who were ≥50% more likely to be with others when smoking than when not.

resultsOnly 13% of ITS were SS+. Although defined solely on the basis of presence of others, SS+ showed a distinct pattern of smoking across multiple dimensions: compared to other ITS (who were significantly less likely to smoke when with others), SS+ smoking was more associated with socializing, being with friends and acquaintances, drinking alcohol, weekends, evening or nighttime, being in other people's homes, but not their own home. SS+ smoking was low in the morning and increased in the evening. SS+ smoked fewer days/week and were less dependent, but did not differ demographically.

conclusionsSocial smoking does constitute a highly distinct smoking pattern, but is not common among adult ITS.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAdultBiomarkersCotinineFemaleHumansMaleSmokingYoung AdultBiomarkersCotinineEcological Momentary AssessmentNon-daily smokingSmokingSocial smoking

Identifiers

PMID26205313
PMCPMC4552312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.