Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26205191›Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2015

EGFR targeted therapies and radiation: Optimizing efficacy by appropriate drug scheduling and patient selection.

Kyle C Cuneo, Mukesh K Nyati, Dipankar Ray, Theodore S Lawrence

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Hypoxia-Long Noncoding RNA Interaction in Solid Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Polymorphisms inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyle C CuneoUniversity of Michigan, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Mukesh K NyatiUniversity of Michigan, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Dipankar RayUniversity of Michigan, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Theodore S LawrenceUniversity of Michigan, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: tsl@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Translational Research in GI CancerP50CA130810 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRENNER, DEAN E. · 2010 to 2016
$11.8M
Targeting SMURF2 as a novel therapy for EGFR driven tumorsR01CA160981 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RAY, DIPANKAR · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA130810NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in tumor progression and treatment resistance for many types of malignancies including head and neck, colorectal, and nonsmall cell lung cancer. Several EGFR targeted therapies are efficacious as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy. Given the toxicity associated with chemoradiation and poor outcomes seen in several types of cancers, combinations of EGFR targeted agents with or without chemotherapy have been tested in patients receiving radiation. To date, the only FDA approved use of an anti-EGFR therapy in combination with radiation therapy is for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Given the important role EGFR plays in lung and colorectal cancer and the benefit of EGFR inhibition combined with chemotherapy in these disease sites, it is perplexing why EGFR targeted therapies in combination with radiation or chemoradiation have not been more successful. In this review we summarize the clinical findings of EGFR targeted therapies combined with radiation and chemoradiation regimens. We then discuss the interaction between EGFR and radiation including radiation induced EGFR signaling, the effect of EGFR on DNA damage repair, and potential mechanisms of radiosensitization. Finally, we examine the potential pitfalls with scheduling EGFR targeted therapies with chemoradiation and the use of predictive biomarkers to improve patient selection.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCetuximabChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials as TopicDrug Administration ScheduleErbB ReceptorsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPatient SelectionRectal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabErbB ReceptorsChemoradiationCombined modality therapyEGFREpidermal growth factor receptorPersonalized medicineRadiation

Identifiers

PMID26205191
PMCPMC4570853
OpenAlexW1038674496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.