Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26205099›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2015

The self-management of longer-term depression: learning from the patient, a qualitative study.

Eleni Chambers, Sarah Cook, Anna Thake, Alexis Foster, Sue Shaw, Rebecca Hutten, Glenys Parry, Tom Ricketts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Experiences of Women who Live with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Qualitative Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eleni ChambersSheffield Hallam University, Centre for Health & Social Care Research, Collegiate Crescent Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. e.chambers@shu.ac.uk.
Sarah CookSheffield Hallam University, Centre for Health & Social Care Research, Collegiate Crescent Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. s.p.cook@shu.ac.uk.
Anna ThakeUniversity of Hertfordshire, Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, Health Research Building, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK. annathake@googlemail.com.
Alexis FosterUniversity of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. alexis.foster@sheffield.ac.uk.
Sue Shaw, Sheffield, UK. sue@dogrough.plus.com.
Rebecca HuttenUniversity of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. r.hutten@sheffield.ac.uk.
Glenys ParryUniversity of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. g.d.parry@sheffield.ac.uk.
Tom RickettsUniversity of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. t.ricketts@sheffield.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is a common mental health condition now viewed as chronic or long-term. More than 50 % of people will have at least one further episode of depression after their first, and therefore it requires long-term management. However, little is known about the effectiveness of self-management in depression, in particular from the patients' perspective. This study aimed to understand how people with longer-term depression manage the condition, how services can best support self-management and whether the principles and concepts of the recovery approach would be advantageous.

methodsSemi-structured in depth interviews were carried out with 21 participants, recruited from a range of sources using maximum variation sampling. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used by a diverse team comprised of service users, practitioners and academics.

resultsFour super-ordinate themes were found: experience of depression, the self, the wider environment, self-management strategies. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants. These included how aspects of themselves such as hope, confidence and motivation could be powerful agents; and how engaging in a wide range of chosen activities could contribute to their emotional, mental, physical, social, spiritual and creative wellbeing.

conclusionsServices in general were not perceived to be useful in specifically facilitating self-management. Increased choice and control were needed and a greater emphasis on an individualised holistic model. Improved information was needed about how to develop strategies and locate resources, especially during the first episode of depression. These concepts echoed those of the recovery approach, which could therefore be seen as valuable in aiding the self-management of depression.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementLearningQualitative ResearchAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationSelf CareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26205099
PMCPMC4513949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.