Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26204954›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2015

NRAS (Q61R), BRAF (V600E) immunohistochemistry: a concomitant tool for mutation screening in melanomas.

Arnaud Uguen, Matthieu Talagas, Sebastian Costa, Laura Samaison, Laure Paule, Zarrin Alavi, Marc De Braekeleer, Cédric Le Marechal, Pascale Marcorelles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Arnaud UguenInserm, U1078, Brest, F-29200, France. arnaud.uguen@chu-brest.fr.
Matthieu TalagasCHRU Brest, Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Brest, F-29220, France. matthieu.talagas@chu-brest.fr.
Sebastian CostaCHRU Brest, Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Brest, F-29220, France. sebastian.costa@chu-brest.fr.
Laura SamaisonCHRU Brest, Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Brest, F-29220, France. laura.samaison@gmail.com.
Laure PauleCHRU Brest, Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire et d'Histocompatibilité, Brest, F-29220, France. laure.paule@chu-brest.fr.
Zarrin AlaviInserm, CIC1412, Brest, F-29200, France. zarrin.alavi@chu-brest.fr.
Marc De BraekeleerInserm, U1078, Brest, F-29200, France. marc.debraekeleer@chu-brest.fr.
Cédric Le MarechalInserm, U1078, Brest, F-29200, France. cedric.lemarechal@chu-brest.fr.
Pascale MarcorellesCHRU Brest, Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Brest, F-29220, France. pascale.marcorelles@chu-brest.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRInserm · FRUniversité Européenne de Bretagne · FRGénétique, Génomique Fonctionnelle et Biotechnologies · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe determination of NRAS and BRAF mutation status is a major requirement in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Mutation specific antibodies against NRAS(Q61R) and BRAF(V600E) proteins could offer additional data on tumor heterogeneity. The specificity and sensitivity of NRAS(Q61R) immunohistochemistry have recently been reported excellent. We aimed to determine the utility of immunohistochemistry using SP174 anti-NRAS(Q61R) and VE1 anti-BRAF(V600E) antibodies in the theranostic mutation screening of melanomas.

methods142 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded melanoma samples from 79 patients were analyzed using pyrosequencing and immunohistochemistry.

results23 and 26 patients were concluded to have a NRAS-mutated or a BRAF-mutated melanoma respectively. The 23 NRAS (Q61R) and 23 BRAF (V600E) -mutant samples with pyrosequencing were all positive in immunohistochemistry with SP174 antibody and VE1 antibody respectively, without any false negative. Proportions and intensities of staining were varied. Other NRAS (Q61L) , NRAS (Q61K) , BRAF (V600K) and BRAF (V600R) mutants were negative in immunohistochemistry. 6 single cases were immunostained but identified as wild-type using pyrosequencing (1 with SP174 and 5 with VE1). 4/38 patients with multiple samples presented molecular discordant data. Technical limitations are discussed to explain those discrepancies. Anyway we could not rule out real tumor heterogeneity.

conclusionsIn our study, we showed that combining immunohistochemistry analysis targeting NRAS(Q61R) and BRAF(V600E) proteins with molecular analysis was a reliable theranostic tool to face challenging samples of melanoma.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMelanomaMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID26204954
PMCPMC4513673
OpenAlexW1744618496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.