Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26204945›Full record

ArticleMarine drugs2015

Molecular Mechanisms by Which a Fucus vesiculosus Extract Mediates Cell Cycle Inhibition and Cell Death in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.

Ulf Geisen, Marion Zenthoefer, Matthias Peipp, Jannik Kerber, Johannes Plenge, Antonella Managò, Markus Fuhrmann, Roland Geyer, Steffen Hennig, Dieter Adam and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Marine drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Antitumor Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Fucaceae: A Source of Bioactive Phlorotannins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ulf GeisenDivision of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, Medical Faculty, CAU, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany. ugeisen@email.uni-kiel.de.
Marion ZenthoeferCRM, Coastal Research & Management, 24159 Kiel, Germany. m.zenthoefer@web.de.
Matthias PeippDivision of Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunotherapy, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany. m.peipp@med2.uni-kiel.de.
Jannik KerberDivision of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, Medical Faculty, CAU, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany. jannik-kerber@t-online.de.
Johannes PlengeInstitute of Immunology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany. Johannes.plenge@gmx.de.
Antonella ManagòDepartment of Biology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy. manago.antonella@gmail.com.
Markus FuhrmannNumares AG, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. markus.fuhrmann@numares.com.
Roland GeyerNumares AG, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Roland.Geyer@numares.com.
Steffen HennigCRM, Coastal Research & Management, 24159 Kiel, Germany. steffen.hennig@crm-online.de.
Dieter AdamInstitute of Immunology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany. dadam@email.uni-kiel.de.
Levent PikerCRM, Coastal Research & Management, 24159 Kiel, Germany. lpiker@oceanbasis.de.
Gerald RimbachInstitute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany. rimbach@foodsci.uni-kiel.de.
Holger KalthoffDivision of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, Medical Faculty, CAU, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany. hkalthoff@email.uni-kiel.de.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive cancer entities, with an extremely poor 5-year survival rate. Therefore, novel therapeutic agents with specific modes of action are urgently needed. Marine organisms represent a promising source to identify new pharmacologically active substances. Secondary metabolites derived from marine algae are of particular interest. The present work describes cellular and molecular mechanisms induced by an HPLC-fractionated, hydrophilic extract derived from the Baltic brown seaweed Fucus vesiculosus (Fv1). Treatment with Fv1 resulted in a strong inhibition of viability in various pancreatic cancer cell lines. This extract inhibited the cell cycle of proliferating cells due to the up-regulation of cell cycle inhibitors, shown on the mRNA (microarray data) and protein level. As a result, cells were dying in a caspase-independent manner. Experiments with non-dividing cells showed that proliferation is a prerequisite for the effectiveness of Fv1. Importantly, Fv1 showed low cytotoxic activity against non-malignant resting T cells and terminally differentiated cells like erythrocytes. Interestingly, accelerated killing effects were observed in combination with inhibitors of autophagy. Our in vitro data suggest that Fv1 may represent a promising new agent that deserves further development towards clinical application.

Indexed as

AutophagyCaspasesCell CycleCell DeathCell Line, TumorFucusHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPlant ExtractsCaspasesPlant Extractsalgaeautophagycancercell cycle inhibitorsFucus vesiculosuspancreaticproliferation

Identifiers

PMID26204945
PMCPMC4515628
OpenAlexW1593090511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.