Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26204283›Full record

ArticleAJR. American journal of roentgenology2015

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.

Rajan T Gupta, Christopher R Kauffman, Kirema Garcia-Reyes, Mark L Palmeri, John F Madden, Thomas J Polascik, Andrew B Rosenkrantz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rajan T Gupta1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
Christopher R Kauffman1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
Kirema Garcia-Reyes1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
Mark L Palmeri2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC.
John F Madden3 Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC.
Thomas J Polascik4 Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Duke Prostate Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Andrew B Rosenkrantz5 Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.

Funding

Radiation Force Imaging of Prostate Cancer and Guidance of Biopsy ProceduresR01CA142824 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGHTINGALE, KATHRYN RADABAUGH · 2010 to 2021
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142824NCI NIH HHS R01CA142824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for benign central zone (CZ) of the prostate were compared with ADC values of benign peripheral zone (PZ), benign transition zone (TZ), and prostate cancer, using histopathologic findings from radical prostatectomy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 27 patients with prostate cancer (mean [± SD] age, 60.0 ± 7.6 years) who had 3-T endorectal coil MRI of the prostate performed before undergoing prostatectomy with whole-mount histopathologic assessment. Mean ADC values were recorded from the ROI within the index tumor and within benign CZ, PZ, and TZ, with the use of histopathologic findings as the reference standard. ADC values of the groups were compared using paired t tests and ROC curve analysis.

resultsThe ADC of benign CZ in the right (1138 ± 123 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s) and left (1166 ± 141 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s) lobes was not significantly different (p = 0.217). However, the ADC of benign CZ (1154 ± 129 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the ADCs of benign PZ (1579 ± 197 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s) and benign TZ (1429 ± 180 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s). Although the ADC of index tumors (1042 ± 134 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s) was significantly lower (p = 0.002) than the ADC of benign CZ there was no significant difference (p = 0.225) between benign CZ and tumors with a Gleason score of 6 (1119 ± 87 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s). In 22.2% of patients (6/27), including five patients who had tumors with a Gleason score greater than 6, the ADC was lower in benign CZ than in the index tumor. The AUC of ADC for the differentiation of benign CZ from index tumors was 72.4% (sensitivity, 70.4%; specificity, 51.9%), and the AUC of ADC for differentiation from tumors with a Gleason score greater than 6 was 76.7% (sensitivity, 75.0%; specificity, 65.0%).

conclusionThe ADC of benign CZ is lower than the ADC of other zones of the prostate and overlaps with the ADC of prostate cancer tissue, including high-grade tumors. Awareness of this potential diagnostic pitfall is important to avoid misinterpreting the normal CZ as suspicious for tumor.

Indexed as

AgedBiopsyDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesProstatectomyProstatic Neoplasmscentral zonemultiparametric prostate MRIprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID26204283
PMCPMC4807133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.