Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26204266›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Self-Management Support Interventions for Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Meta-Review.

Hannah L Parke, Eleni Epiphaniou, Gemma Pearce, Stephanie J C Taylor, Aziz Sheikh, Chris J Griffiths, Trish Greenhalgh, Hilary Pinnock

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Theory-Based Self-Management Interventions for Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Caregiver-mediated exercises for improving outcomes after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah L ParkeMultidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Eleni EpiphaniouMultidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Gemma PearceCentre for Technology Enabled Health Research (CTEHR), Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Stephanie J C TaylorMultidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute of Medical Informatics and Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Chris J GriffithsMultidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Trish GreenhalghNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hilary PinnockUsher Institute of Medical Informatics and Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health 11/1014/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is considerable policy interest in promoting self-management in patients with long-term conditions, but it remains uncertain whether these interventions are effective in stroke patients.

designSystematic meta-review of the evidence for self-management support interventions with stroke survivors to inform provision of healthcare services.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED, BNI, Database of Abstracts of Reviews for Effectiveness, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for systematic reviews of self-management support interventions for stroke survivors. Quality was assessed using the R-AMSTAR tool, and data extracted using a customised data extraction form. We undertook a narrative synthesis of the reviews' findings.

resultsFrom 12,400 titles we selected 13 systematic reviews (published 2003-2012) representing 101 individual trials. Although the term 'self-management' was rarely used, key elements of self-management support such as goal setting, action planning, and problem solving were core components of therapy rehabilitation interventions. We found high quality evidence that supported self-management in the context of therapy rehabilitation delivered soon after the stroke event resulted in short-term (< 1 year) improvements in basic and extended activities of daily living, and a reduction in poor outcomes (dependence/death). There is some evidence that rehabilitation and problem solving interventions facilitated reintegration into the community.

conclusionsSelf-management terminology is rarely used in the context of stroke. However, therapy rehabilitation currently successfully delivers elements of self-management support to stroke survivors and their caregivers with improved outcomes. Future research should focus on managing the emotional, medical and social tasks of long-term survivorship.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationSurvivorsActivities of Daily LivingCaregiversHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareSelf CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26204266
PMCPMC4512724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.