ArticleIMA fungus2015
Proposals to clarify and enhance the naming of fungi under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants.
Article in IMA fungus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atraric Acid Ameliorates Neurological Dysfunction in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice by Activating Autophagy to Alleviate Brain Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- RESCRIPt: Reproducible sequence taxonomy reference database management.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Setting scientific names at all taxonomic ranks in italics facilitates their quick recognition in scientific papers.IMA fungus · 2020Article
- A worldwide nomenclature revision of sequestrateFungal systematics and evolution · 2018Article
- Fungal nomenclature evolving: changes adopted by the 19IMA fungus · 2017Article
- Overlooked competing asexual and sexually typified generic names ofIMA fungus · 2016Article
- Recommendations for competing sexual-asexually typified generic names in Sordariomycetes (except Diaporthales, Hypocreales, and Magnaporthales).IMA fungus · 2016Article
- Recommended names for pleomorphic genera in Dothideomycetes.IMA fungus · 2015Article
- Accepted Trichoderma names in the year 2015.IMA fungus · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Twenty-three proposals to modify the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants adopted in 2011 with respect to the provisions for fungi are made, in accordance with the wishes of mycologists expressed at the 10(th) International Mycological Congress in Bangkok in 2014, and with the support of the International Commission on the Taxonomy of Fungi (ICTF), the votes of which are presented here. The proposals relate to: conditions for epitypification, registration of later typifications, protected lists of names, removal of exemptions for lichen-forming fungi, provision of a diagnosis when describing a new taxon, citation of sanctioned names, avoiding homonyms in other kingdoms, ending preference for sexually typified names, and treatment of conspecific names with the same epithet. These proposals are also being published in Taxon, will be considered by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi and General Committee on Nomenclature, and voted on at the 19(th) International Botanical Congress in Shenzhen, China, in 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.