ArticleBMC nursing2015
Invisible no more: a scoping review of the health care aide workforce literature.
Article in BMC nursing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors Associated With Residents' Responsive Behaviors Toward Staff in Long-Term Care Homes: A Systematic Review.The Gerontologist · 2023Pooled it
- Delegation of medication administration from registered nurses to non-registered support workers in community care settings: A systematic review with critical interpretive synthesis.International journal of nursing studies · 2022Pooled it
- Building a Program Theory of Implementation Using Process Evaluation of a Complex Quality Improvement Trial in Nursing Homes.The Gerontologist · 2024Trial
- Sustained effects of the INFORM cluster randomized trial: an observational post-intervention study.Implementation science : IS · 2021Trial
- Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention.Implementation science : IS · 2020Trial
- Comparing effects of two higher intensity feedback interventions with simple feedback on improving staff communication in nursing homes-the INFORM cluster-randomized controlled trial.Implementation science : IS · 2020Trial
- Essential, Yet Precarious, Mistreated, Sick and Medicalized: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study on Homecare Aides in Spain.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026Article
- Experiences from a language development intervention in nursing homes from the perspective of first-line managers, language advocates and care staff: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Understanding workplace peer support among healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care at home: A realist review.Palliative medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Construction of a pre-service training program for nursing assistants in China.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Impact of an Educational Intervention on Job Satisfaction Among Home Health Aides: Findings from a Mixed-Methods Analysis of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Home health care management & practice · 2026Article
- Article
- The reality of neonatal nursing work in Kenya and implications for quality and safety: Direct observation of tasks and time utilisation.International journal of nursing studies · 2025Article
- Implementation of a task-shifting and task sharing intervention: A case of ward assistants in Kenyan neonatal units.International journal of nursing studies · 2025Article
- Exploring the core characteristics of competence in healthcare assistants: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Rural health care aide training experiences in a Canadian tuition assistance program: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The cooperative difference: perceived drivers of higher care quality at home care cooperatives.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- The Impact of Person-Centered Care Indicators on Care Strain Among Care Aides in Long-Term Care Homes in New Brunswick: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Increasing expenditures on home- and community-based services: Do home care workers benefit?Health services research · 2025Article
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare aides (HCAs) are the primary caregivers for vulnerable older persons. They have many titles and are largely unregulated, which contributes to their relative invisibility. The objective of this scoping review was to evaluate the breadth and depth of the HCA workforce literature.
methodsWe conducted a search of seven online bibliographic databases. Studies were included if published since 1995 in English, peer-reviewed journals. Results were iteratively synthesized within and across the following five categories: education, supply, use, demand and injury and illness.
resultsOf 5,045 citations screened, 82 studies met inclusion criteria. Few examined HCA education; particularly trainee characteristics, program location, length and content. Results in supply indicated that the average HCA was female, 36-45 years and had an education level of high school or less. Home health HCAs were, on average, older and were more likely to be immigrants than those working in other settings. The review of studies exploring HCA use revealed that their role was unclear - variation in duties, level of autonomy and work setting make describing "the" role of an HCA near impossible. Projected increased demand for HCAs and high rates of turnover, both at the profession and facility-level, elicit predictions of future HCA shortages. Home health HCAs experienced comparatively lower job stability, earned less, worked the fewest hours and were less likely to have fringe benefits than HCAs employed in hospitals and nursing homes. The review of studies related to HCA illness and injury revealed that they were at comparatively higher risk of injury than registered nurses and licensed practical nurses.
conclusionsThis is the largest, most comprehensive scoping review of HCA workforce literature to date. Our results indicate that the HCA workforce is both invisible and ubiquitous; as long as this is the case, governments and healthcare organizations will be limited in their ability to develop and implement feasible, effective HCA workforce plans. The continued undervaluation of HCAs adversely impacts care providers, the institutions they work for and those who depend on their care. Future workforce planning and research necessitates national HCA registries, or at minimum, directories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.