Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26203107›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

The transformation of synaptic to system plasticity in motor output from the sacral cord of the adult mouse.

Mingchen C Jiang, Sherif M Elbasiouny, William F Collins, C J Heckman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Involvement of CaFrontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingchen C JiangDepartment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; m-jiang@northwestern.edu.
Sherif M ElbasiounyDepartments of Neuroscience, Cell Biology, and Physiology and Biomedical, Industrial and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio;
William F CollinsDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; and.
C J HeckmanDepartment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

The impact of neuromodulatory state on the excitability changes of motoneurons and the motor pool in ALSR01NS091836 · NINDS · WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Sherif M Elbasiouny · 2015 to 2026
$4.7M
Electrical and mechanical properties of motor units in a mouse model of ALSR01NS077863 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HECKMAN, CHARLES · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
Computer simulations of populations of mammalian motor unitsR01NS071951 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HECKMAN, CHARLES · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-071951NINDS NIH HHS NS-077863NINDS NIH HHS NS-091836NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic plasticity is fundamental in shaping the output of neural networks. The transformation of synaptic plasticity at the cellular level into plasticity at the system level involves multiple factors, including behavior of local networks of interneurons. Here we investigate the synaptic to system transformation for plasticity in motor output in an in vitro preparation of the adult mouse spinal cord. System plasticity was assessed from compound action potentials (APs) in spinal ventral roots, which were generated simultaneously by the axons of many motoneurons (MNs). Synaptic plasticity was assessed from intracellular recordings of MNs. A computer model of the MN pool was used to identify the middle steps in the transformation from synaptic to system behavior. Two input systems that converge on the same MN pool were studied: one sensory and one descending. The two synaptic input systems generated very different motor outputs, with sensory stimulation consistently evoking short-term depression (STD) whereas descending stimulation had bimodal plasticity: STD at low frequencies but short-term facilitation (STF) at high frequencies. Intracellular and pharmacological studies revealed contributions from monosynaptic excitation and stimulus time-locked inhibition but also considerable asynchronous excitation sustained from local network activity. The computer simulations showed that STD in the monosynaptic excitatory input was the primary driver of the system STD in the sensory input whereas network excitation underlies the bimodal plasticity in the descending system. These results provide insight on the roles of plasticity in the monosynaptic and polysynaptic inputs converging on the same MN pool to overall motor plasticity.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAction PotentialsAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMotor NeuronsSensory Receptor CellsSpinal CordSpinal Nerve RootsSynapsesSynaptic Potentialsmodelingmotoneuronsshort-term plasticityspinal motor pool

Identifiers

PMID26203107
PMCPMC4579292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.