Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26203104›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Differential encoding of spatial information among retinal on cone bipolar cells.

Robert J Purgert, Peter D Lukasiewicz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J PurgertDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and.
Peter D LukasiewiczDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Lukasiewicz@vision.wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER VISION RESEARCHP30EY002687 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Philip Andrew Ruzycki · 1985 to 2026
$18.4M
Synaptic transmission &its modulation in the retinaR01EY008922 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LUKASIEWICZ, PETER D · 1991 to 2017
$7.2M
Research Training Program in the Vision SciencesT32EY013360 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHIMING CHEN, Daniel Kerschensteiner · 2000 to 2026
$5.6M
NEI NIH HHS EY-013360NEI NIH HHS EY-02687NEI NIH HHS EY-08922NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002687NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008922NEI NIH HHS T32 EY013360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retina is the first stage of visual processing. It encodes elemental features of visual scenes. Distinct cone bipolar cells provide the substrate for this to occur. They encode visual information, such as color and luminance, a principle known as parallel processing. Few studies have directly examined whether different forms of spatial information are processed in parallel among cone bipolar cells. To address this issue, we examined the spatial information encoded by mouse ON cone bipolar cells, the subpopulation excited by increments in illumination. Two types of spatial processing were identified. We found that ON cone bipolar cells with axons ramifying in the central inner plexiform layer were tuned to preferentially encode small stimuli. By contrast, ON cone bipolar cells with axons ramifying in the proximal inner plexiform layer, nearest the ganglion cell layer, were tuned to encode both small and large stimuli. This dichotomy in spatial tuning is attributable to amacrine cells providing stronger inhibition to central ON cone bipolar cells compared with proximal ON cone bipolar cells. Furthermore, background illumination altered this difference in spatial tuning. It became less pronounced in bright light, as amacrine cell-driven inhibition became pervasive among all ON cone bipolar cells. These results suggest that differential amacrine cell input determined the distinct spatial encoding properties among ON cone bipolar cells. These findings enhance the known parallel processing capacity of the retina.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionAmacrine CellsAnimalsAxonsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeural InhibitionRetinal Bipolar CellsRetinal Cone Photoreceptor Cellsbipolar cellelectrophysiologyinhibitionreceptive fieldretina

Identifiers

PMID26203104
PMCPMC4571766
OpenAlexW1765060597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.