ArticleFamilial cancer2015
Risk of colorectal cancer for people with a mutation in both a MUTYH and a DNA mismatch repair gene.
Article in Familial cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Basis of Adenomatous Gastrointestinal Polyposis Syndromes: Role of Pathogenic and Benign Variants in Disease Onset.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- A New Inverse Probability of Selection Weighted Cox Model to Deal With Outcome-Dependent Sampling in Survival Analysis.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Article
- Screening for Mutations in Hereditary Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Region with High Endogamy in Brazil.Global medical genetics · 2023Article
- Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Autosomal Dominant and Recessive APC Mutation-Negative Colorectal Adenomatous Polyposis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Review
- Co-occurrence of germline pathogenic variants for different hereditary cancer syndromes in patients with Lynch syndrome.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2021Article
- Digenic inheritance of MSH6 and MUTYH variants in familial colorectal cancer.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2020Article
- When you're strange: Unusual features of the MUTYH glycosylase and implications in cancer.DNA repair · 2019Review
- Association of monoallelic MUTYH mutation among Egyptian patients with colorectal cancer.Familial cancer · 2017Article
- Risk of extracolonic cancers for people with biallelic and monoallelic mutations in MUTYH.International journal of cancer · 2016Article
- An Individual with Both MUTYH-Associated Polyposis and Lynch Syndrome Identified by Multi-Gene Hereditary Cancer Panel Testing: A Case Report.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The base excision repair protein, MUTYH, functionally interacts with the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. As genetic testing moves from testing one gene at a time, to gene panel and whole exome next generation sequencing approaches, understandin g the risk associated with co-existence of germline mutations in these genes will be important for clinical interpretation and management. From the Colon Cancer Family Registry, we identified 10 carriers who had both a MUTYH mutation (6 with c.1187G>A p.(Gly396Asp), 3 with c.821G>A p.(Arg274Gln), and 1 with c.536A>G p.(Tyr179Cys)) and a MMR gene mutation (3 in MLH1, 6 in MSH2, and 1 in PMS2), 375 carriers of a single (monoallelic) MUTYH mutation alone, and 469 carriers of a MMR gene mutation alone. Of the 10 carriers of both gene mutations, 8 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Using a weighted cohort analysis, we estimated that risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of both a MUTYH and a MMR gene mutation was substantially higher than that for carriers of a MUTYH mutation alone [hazard ratio (HR) 21.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.19-50.1; p < 0.001], but not different from that for carriers of a MMR gene mutation alone (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.63-5.99; p = 0.25). Within the limited power of this study, there was no evidence that a monoallelic MUTYH gene mutation confers additional risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of a MMR gene mutation alone. Our finding suggests MUTYH mutation testing in MMR gene mutation carriers is not clinically informative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.