Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26202828›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in therapy2015

Critical Appraisal on Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Literature Search.

Konstadinos G Boboridis, Jimmy Uddin, Dimitrios G Mikropoulos, Catey Bunce, George Mangouritsas, Irini C Voudouragkaki, Anastasios G P Konstas

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tocilizumab for thyroid eye disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Thyroid Eye Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Three-dimensional characterisation of the globe position in the orbit.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Cutting-edge endonasal surgical approaches to thyroid ophthalmopathy.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Konstadinos G Boboridis1st University Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Kyriakidi Street, 546 36, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Jimmy Uddin
Dimitrios G Mikropoulos
Catey Bunce
George Mangouritsas
Irini C Voudouragkaki
Anastasios G P Konstas
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRHellenic Red Cross · GRMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOrbital decompression is the indicated procedure for addressing exophthalmos and compressive optic neuropathy in thyroid eye disease. There are an abundance of techniques for removal of orbital bone, fat, or a combination published in the scientific literature. The relative efficacy and complications of these interventions in relation to the specific indications remain as yet undocumented. We performed a systematic review of the current published evidence for the effectiveness of orbital decompression, possible complications, and impact on quality of life.

methodsWe searched the current databases for medical literature and controlled trials, oculoplastic textbooks, and conference proceedings to identify relevant data up to February 2015. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more interventions for orbital decompression.

resultsWe identified only two eligible RCTs for inclusion in the review. As a result of the significant variability between studies on decompression, i.e., methodology and outcome measures, we did not perform a meta-analysis. One study suggests that the transantral approach and endonasal technique had similar effects in reducing exophthalmos but the latter is safer. The second study provides evidence that intravenous steroids may be superior to primary surgical decompression in the management of compressive optic neuropathy requiring less secondary surgical procedures.

conclusionMost of the published literature on orbital decompression consists of retrospective, uncontrolled trials. There is evidence from those studies that removal of the medial and lateral wall (balanced) and the deep lateral wall decompression, with or without fat removal, may be the most effective surgical methods with only few complications. There is a clear unmet need for controlled trials evaluating the different techniques for orbital decompression. Ideally, future studies should address the effectiveness, possible complications, quality of life, and cost of each intervention.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalGraves OphthalmopathyHumansOrbitQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26202828
PMCPMC4522025
OpenAlexW1044872621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.