Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26202596›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2015

Sorafenib in patients with locally advanced and metastatic chordomas: a phase II trial of the French Sarcoma Group (GSF/GETO).

E Bompas, A Le Cesne, E Tresch-Bruneel, L Lebellec, V Laurence, O Collard, E Saada-Bouzid, N Isambert, J Y Blay, E Y Amela and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Regorafenib for the Treatment of Sarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Challenges of Systemic Therapy Investigations for Bone Sarcomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Advancement of PI3 Kinase Inhibitor Combination Therapies for PI3K-Aberrant Chordoma.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

E BompasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes.
A Le CesneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.
E Tresch-BruneelMethodology and Biostatistics Unit.
L LebellecDepartment of General Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille.
V LaurenceDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris.
O CollardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Lucien Neuwirth, Saint Priest en Jarez.
E Saada-BouzidDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice.
N IsambertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon.
J Y BlayDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon.
E Y AmelaDepartment of General Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille.
S SalasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hopital La Timone, Marseille.
C ChevreauDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse.
F BertucciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille.
A ItalianoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux.
S ClisantClinical Research Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille.
N PenelDepartment of General Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille Clinical Research and Methodology Platform, SIRIC OncoLille Consortium, Lille, France n-penel@o-lambret.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensual treatment of locally advanced or metastatic chordomas. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled phase II trial of sorafenib (800 mg/day). The primary end point was the 9-month progression-free rate according to RECIST 1.1. All patients had documented progressive disease at the time of study entry.

resultsTwenty-seven patients were enrolled between May 2011 and January 2014. The median age was 64 (range, 30-86) years. There were 17 men and 10 women. Twelve patients had been previously treated with chemotherapy and molecularly targeted agents. The maximum toxicity grade per patient was grade 3 in 21 cases (77.8%) and grade 4 in 4 cases (14.8%). Sorafenib provided an intent-to-treat best objective response of 1/27 [3.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1% to 19.0%], a 9-month progression-free rate of 73.0% (95% CI 46.1-88.0) and a 12-month overall survival rate of 86.5% (95% CI 55.8-96.5). Survival curves were similar in pretreated and not pretreated patients. DISCUSSION: Additional clinical trials further exploring sorafenib as a treatment of locally advanced or metastatic chordomas are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChordomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPrognosisSarcomaAntineoplastic AgentsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibchordomaphase II trialsorafenib

Identifiers

PMID26202596
PMCPMC4576908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.