Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26202507›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2014

Evaluation and comparison of microvessel density using the markers CD34 and CD105 in regenerative nodules, dysplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Vanderlei Segatelli, Ebe Christie de Oliveira, Ilka F S F Boin, Elaine Cristina Ataide, Cecilia Amelia F Escanhoela

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CD105: tumor diagnosis, prognostic marker and future tumor therapeutic target.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Endoglin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sorafenib and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy: A Promising Approach for Treatment of HCC.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanderlei SegatelliDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Albert Einstein, Avenida Albert Einstein, 627, Morumbi, São Paulo, SP, 05652-900, Brazil. v.segate@hotmail.com.
Ebe Christie de OliveiraDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Albert Einstein, Avenida Albert Einstein, 627, Morumbi, São Paulo, SP, 05652-900, Brazil.
Ilka F S F BoinUnit of Liver Transplantation, Faculty of Medical Science, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Elaine Cristina AtaideFaculty of Medical Science, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Cecilia Amelia F EscanhoelaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medical Science, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is multifactorial and angiogenesis plays a fundamental role, mainly because HCC is a highly vascularized tumor.

methodsIn this study, we determined microvessel density (MVD) using the immunohistochemical markers, CD34 and CD105 (Endoglin), in 44 hepatectomy specimens, encompassing 44 malignant nodules (HCC), 44 regenerative nodules (RN), and 15 dysplastic nodules (DN). The evaluation included the determination of MVD in all nodules. For statistical analysis, a descriptive analysis was carried out using measurements of position and dispersion for continuous variables; ANOVA was used to compare between groups, considering p < 0.05 as statistically significant.

resultsWe observed a significant difference when comparing CD34 and CD105 immunoexpression in HCC, DN, and RN. CD105 was predominantly expressed in the peripheral regions in HCC, with mean MVD scores of 6.2 ± 4.1 and 10.7 ± 4.4 at the center and periphery of the nodules, respectively, with significant differences between groups (p < 0.0001). CD34 had higher mean MVD scores than CD105 in HCC, with a more uniform positivity pattern. CD105 immunoexpression in DN exhibited a pattern similar to HCC. However, in RN, CD105 exhibited a higher MVD score in the central portion of the nodules. CD105 was expressed in a subset of newly formed microvessels in HCC and demonstrated an elevated mean MVD in cirrhotic or regenerative nodules.

conclusionsMVD determined by CD34 and CD105 expression may be used as an additional parameter to distinguish benign from malignant liver nodules.

Indexed as

AngiogenesisDysplastic nodulesHepatocellular carcinomaMicrovessel densityRegenerative nodules

Identifiers

PMID26202507
OpenAlexW2011525358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.