Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26202488›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2015

The effect of 8 or 5 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM Extension study.

S Papapoulos, K Lippuner, C Roux, C J F Lin, D L Kendler, E M Lewiecki, M L Brandi, E Czerwiński, E Franek, P Lakatos and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Treatment for osteoporosis in people with beta-thalassaemia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Probability of achieving bone mineral density treatment goals with denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Trial
  6. One versus 2 years of alendronate following denosumab: the CARD extension.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density T-Score and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk Over 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Trial
  10. The risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures is decreased in subjects experiencing fracture while on denosumab: results from the FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension studies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Hypocalcemia following denosumab in osteoporosis: Incidence and risk factors in a Saudi cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

S PapapoulosCenter for Bone Quality, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. M.V.Iken@lumc.nl.
K LippunerBerne University Hospital and University, Berne, Switzerland.
C RouxParis Descartes University, Paris, France.
C J F LinAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
D L KendlerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
E M LewieckiNew Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
M L BrandiUniversity of Florence, Florence, Italy.
E CzerwińskiKrakow Medical Center, Krakow, Poland.
E FranekMossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
P LakatosSemmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
C MautalenCentro de Osteopatias Medicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
S MinisolaSapienza University, Rome, Italy.
J Y ReginsterUniversity of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
S JensenCenter for Clinical and Basic Research, Ballerup, Denmark.
N S DaizadehAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
A WangAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
M GavinAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
C LibanatiAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
R B WagmanAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
H G BoneMichigan Bone & Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe FREEDOM study and its Extension provide long-term information about the effects of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Treatment for up to 8 years was associated with persistent reduction of bone turnover, continued increases in bone mineral density, low fracture incidence, and a favorable benefit/risk profile.

introductionThis study aims to report the results through year 5 of the FREEDOM Extension study, representing up to 8 years of continued denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

methodsWomen who completed the 3-year FREEDOM study were eligible to enter the 7-year open-label FREEDOM Extension in which all participants are scheduled to receive denosumab, since placebo assignment was discontinued for ethical reasons. A total of 4550 women enrolled in the Extension (2343 long-term; 2207 cross-over). In this analysis, women in the long-term and cross-over groups received denosumab for up to 8 and 5 years, respectively.

resultsThroughout the Extension, sustained reduction of bone turnover markers (BTMs) was observed in both groups. In the long-term group, mean bone mineral density (BMD) continued to increase significantly at each time point measured, for cumulative 8-year gains of 18.4 and 8.3 % at the lumbar spine and total hip, respectively. In the cross-over group, mean BMD increased significantly from the Extension baseline for 5-year cumulative gains of 13.1 and 6.2 % at the lumbar spine and total hip, respectively. The yearly incidence of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures remained low in both groups. The incidence of adverse and serious adverse events did not increase over time. Through Extension year 5, eight events of osteonecrosis of the jaw and two events of atypical femoral fracture were confirmed.

conclusionsDenosumab treatment for up to 8 years was associated with persistent reductions of BTMs, continued BMD gains, low fracture incidence, and a consistent safety profile.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBone RemodelingCross-Over StudiesDenosumabDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabBone mineral densityClinical trialDenosumabFractureOsteoporosisSafety

Identifiers

PMID26202488
PMCPMC4656716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.