Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26202435›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2015

Mucosal, Cellular, and Humoral Immune Responses Induced by Different Live Infectious Bronchitis Virus Vaccination Regimes and Protection Conferred against Infectious Bronchitis Virus Q1 Strain.

Rajesh Chhabra, Anne Forrester, Stephane Lemiere, Faez Awad, Julian Chantrey, Kannan Ganapathy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rajesh ChhabraUniversity of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, South Wirral, United Kingdom College Central Laboratory, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences (LUVAS), Hisar, India.
Anne ForresterUniversity of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, South Wirral, United Kingdom.
Stephane LemiereMerial S.A.S., Lyon, France.
Faez AwadUniversity of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, South Wirral, United Kingdom.
Julian ChantreyUniversity of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, South Wirral, United Kingdom.
Kannan GanapathyUniversity of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, South Wirral, United Kingdom gana@liv.ac.uk.
University of Liverpool · GBLala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · INMersen (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of the present study were to assess the mucosal, cellular, and humoral immune responses induced by two different infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) vaccination regimes and their efficacy against challenge by a variant IBV Q1. One-day-old broiler chicks were vaccinated with live H120 alone (group I) or in combination with CR88 (group II). The two groups were again vaccinated with CR88 at 14 days of age (doa). One group was kept as the control (group III). A significant increase in lachrymal IgA levels was observed at 4 doa and then peaked at 14 doa in the vaccinated groups. The IgA levels in group II were significantly higher than those in group I from 14 doa. Using immunohistochemistry to examine changes in the number of CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells in the trachea, it was found that overall patterns of CD8(+) cells were dominant compared to those of CD4(+) cells in the two vaccinated groups. CD8(+) cells were significantly higher in group II than those in group I at 21 and 28 doa. All groups were challenged oculonasally with a virulent Q1 strain at 28 doa, and their protection was assessed. The two vaccinated groups gave excellent ciliary protection against Q1, although group II's histopathology lesion scores and viral RNA loads in the trachea and kidney showed greater levels of protection than those in group I. These results suggest that greater protection is achieved from the combined vaccination of H120 and CR88 of 1-day-old chicks, followed by CR88 at 14 doa.

Indexed as

Immunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChickensCoronavirus InfectionsImmunity, MucosalImmunization ScheduleInfectious bronchitis virusKidneyPoultry DiseasesTracheaVaccinationVaccines, AttenuatedAntibodies, ViralVaccines, AttenuatedViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26202435
PMCPMC4550669
OpenAlexW2379053829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.