ArticleHepatology international2014
Everolimus-based immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients: a single-centre experience.
Article in Hepatology international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individualized management of immunosuppressants in liver transplant recipients by using a novel immune score system.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- A Reduction of Calcineurin Inhibitors May Improve Survival in Patients with De Novo Colorectal Cancer after Liver Transplantation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Article
- Cross-sectional analysis of immunosuppressive regimens focused on everolimus after liver transplantation in a Korean high-volume transplantation center.Korean journal of transplantation · 2019Article
- Management of very late peritoneal metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma 10 years after liver transplantation: Lessons from two cases.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2018Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of long-term immunosuppressive regimens after liver transplantation at Asan Medical Center: Increased preference for mycophenolate mofetil.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2018Article
- Use of everolimus in liver transplantation.World journal of hepatology · 2017Review
- Hepatocellular cancer and recurrence after liver transplantation: what about the impact of immunosuppression?Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017Review
- Oncological Impact of M-Tor Inhibitor Immunosuppressive Therapy after Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Review of the Literature.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2016Review
- Everolimus with or without mycophenolate mofetil in a liver transplantation setting: a single-center experience.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEverolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has been shown to reduce growth factor-mediated cell proliferation, but data regarding its effectiveness and impact on renal function and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in liver transplant (LT) recipients are limited.
methodsWe evaluated LT recipients with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression regimen in whom everolimus treatment was initiated. The changes in laboratory data, including glomerular filtration rate (GFR), compared to the baseline (i.e. the day of everolimus conversion), were assessed.
resultsTotally, 44 consecutive patients (32 men, age 55 ± 7 years) were commenced on everolimus [indications: renal dysfunction post-LT (16 patients, group 1); prevention of HCC recurrence (21 patients) or others (7 patients), group 2] at 6 months (range 1-206) post-LT. After 48 (range 12-76) months, all patients were alive without any rejection episodes. Compared to group 2 patients, group 1 patients had significantly greater improvement in renal function (DGFR: 12 ± 5 vs. -0.4 ± 0.2 ml/min, p = 0.02). GFR at baseline (OR 0.08, p = 0.002) and the combination of everolimus + MMF (OR 0.14, p = 0.024) were the factors independently associated with improvement in renal function. Finally, HCC recurrence was observed less frequently in the everolimus group of patients (n = 21) compared to the CNI-historical control group (n = 22) with HCC before LT [0/21 (0 %) vs. 4/22 (18.5 %), log rank p = 0.055), although the two groups of recipients had similar baseline characteristics and follow-up.
conclusionsEverolimus is effective and is associated with low rates of HCC recurrence and improvement of renal function in LT recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.