Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26201968›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Relationship between cardiovascular risk and lipid testing in one health care system: a retrospective cohort study.

Robert J Reid, Melissa L Anderson, Paul A Fishman, Jennifer B McClure, Ron L Johnson, Sheryl L Catz, Beverly B Green

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert J ReidGroup Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA. reid.rj@ghc.org.
Melissa L AndersonGroup Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA. anderson.mellissa@ghc.org.
Paul A FishmanGroup Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA. fishman.p@ghc.org.
Jennifer B McClureGroup Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA. mcclure.j@ghc.org.
Ron L JohnsonGroup Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA. johnson.rl@ghc.org.
Sheryl L CatzBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, 4610 X Street, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. scatz@ucdavis.edu.
Beverly B GreenGroup Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA. green.b@ghc.org.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USGroup Health Cooperative · USSeattle University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Collaborative Behavioral e-Care to Decrease Cardiovascular Risk (e-Compare)RC1HL100590 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI GREEN, BEVERLY BETH · 2009 to 2010
$989k
NHLBI NIH HHS RC1 HL100590NHLBI NIH HHS RC1HL100590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF) recommends routine lipid screening beginning age 35 for men [1]. For women age 20 and older, as well as men age 20-34, screening is recommended if cardiovascular risk factors are present. Prior research has focused on underutilization but not overuse of lipid testing. The objective is to document over- and under-use of lipid testing in an insured population of persons at low, moderate and high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk for persons not already on statins.

methodsThe study is a retrospective cohort study that included all adults without prior CVD who were continuously enrolled in a large integrated healthcare system from 2005 to 2010. Measures included lipid test frequency extracted from administrative data and Framingham cardiovascular risk equations applied using electronic medical record data. Five year lipid testing patterns were examined by age, sex and CVD risk. Generalized linear models were used to estimate the relative risk for over testing associated with patient characteristics.

resultsAmong males and females for whom testing is not recommended, 35.8 % and 61.5 % received at least one lipid test in the prior 5 years and 8.4 % and 24.4 % had two or more. Over-testing was associated with age, race, comorbidity, primary care use and neighborhood income. Among individuals at moderate and high-risk (not already treated with statins) and for whom screening is recommended, between 21.4 % and 25.1 % of individuals received no screening in the prior 5 years.

conclusionsBased on USPSTF lipid screening recommendations, this study documents substantial over-testing among individuals with low CVD risk and under-testing among individuals with moderate to high-risk not already on statins. Opportunity exists to better focus lipid screening efforts appropriate to CVD risk.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipidsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOrganizational Case StudiesPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsWashingtonHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipids

Identifiers

PMID26201968
PMCPMC4511977
OpenAlexW1640573431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.