Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26201835›Full record

Trial reportMuscle & nerve2016

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of incobotulinumtoxina for upper-limb post-stroke spasticity.

Elie Paul Elovic, Michael C Munin, Petr Kaňovský, Angelika Hanschmann, Reinhard Hiersemenzel, Christina Marciniak

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Muscle & nerve, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01392300 (Prospective, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Multi-center Study With an Open-label Extension Period to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 in the Treatment of Post-stroke Spasticity of the Upper Limb), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01392300 phase3completednot on this map

Prospective, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Multi-center Study With an Open-label Extension Period to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 in the Treatment of Post-stroke Spasticity of the Upper Limb

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbHRan2011 to 2014Enrolled317ConditionsPost-stroke Spasticity of the Upper LimbArmsIncobotulinumtoxinA (400 Units), Placebo Comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elie Paul ElovicHealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Utah, 8074 South 1300 East, Sandy, Utah, 84094, USA.
Michael C MuninDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Petr KaňovskýFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry and University Hospital, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Angelika HanschmannMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Reinhard HiersemenzelMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christina MarciniakDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEfficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke upper-limb spasticity were studied.

methodsSubjects randomized 2:1 to incobotulinumtoxinA (fixed dose 400 U) or placebo, with fixed doses for the primary target clinical pattern (PTCP; flexed elbow, 200 U; flexed wrist, 150 U; clenched fist, 100 U). Doses for non-primary patterns were flexible within predefined ranges.

resultsAt week 4, incobotulinumtoxinA led to larger improvements in PTCP Ashworth scale (AS) scores than placebo [least-squares mean change ± standard error: -0.9 ± 0.06 (n = 171) vs. -0.5 ± 0.08 (n = 88); P < 0.001], and more subjects were PTCP AS responders (≥1-point improvement) with incobotulinumtoxinA (69.6%) than with placebo (37.5%; P < 0.001). Investigator's Global Impression of Change confirmed superiority of incobotulinumtoxinA vs. placebo (P = 0.003). IncobotulinumtoxinA was associated with functional improvements, as demonstrated in responder rates for Disability Assessment Scale principal target at week 4 (P = 0.007). Adverse events were mainly mild/moderate, and were reported by 22.4% (incobotulinumtoxinA) and 16.8% (placebo) of subjects.

conclusionsIncobotulinumtoxinA significantly improved upper-limb spasticity and associated disability, and was well-tolerated.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceBotulinum Toxins, Type ADouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle SpasticityNeuromuscular AgentsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeBotulinum Toxins, Type AincobotulinumtoxinANeuromuscular Agentsbotulinum toxins, type AincobotulinumtoxinAmuscle spasticitystrokeXeomin

Identifiers

PMID26201835
PMCPMC5064747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.