Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26201819›Full record

ArticleGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2015

The Arabidopsis information resource: Making and mining the "gold standard" annotated reference plant genome.

Tanya Z Berardini, Leonore Reiser, Donghui Li, Yarik Mezheritsky, Robert Muller, Emily Strait, Eva Huala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 635 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
635citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

635 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Proteomic analysis may explain differences inPlant signaling & behavior · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

575 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tanya Z BerardiniPhoenix Bioinformatics, Redwood City, California.
Leonore ReiserPhoenix Bioinformatics, Redwood City, California.
Donghui LiPhoenix Bioinformatics, Redwood City, California.
Yarik MezheritskyPhoenix Bioinformatics, Redwood City, California.
Robert MullerPhoenix Bioinformatics, Redwood City, California.
Emily StraitPhoenix Bioinformatics, Redwood City, California.
Eva HualaPhoenix Bioinformatics, Redwood City, California.

Funding

Resource ProjectU41HG002273 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMAS, PAUL D. · 2012 to 2021
$34.7M
Gene Ontology ConsortiumP41HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS U41HG002273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) is a continuously updated, online database of genetic and molecular biology data for the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana that provides a global research community with centralized access to data for over 30,000 Arabidopsis genes. TAIR's biocurators systematically extract, organize, and interconnect experimental data from the literature along with computational predictions, community submissions, and high throughput datasets to present a high quality and comprehensive picture of Arabidopsis gene function. TAIR provides tools for data visualization and analysis, and enables ordering of seed and DNA stocks, protein chips, and other experimental resources. TAIR actively engages with its users who contribute expertise and data that augments the work of the curatorial staff. TAIR's focus in an extensive and evolving ecosystem of online resources for plant biology is on the critically important role of extracting experimentally based research findings from the literature and making that information computationally accessible. In response to the loss of government grant funding, the TAIR team founded a nonprofit entity, Phoenix Bioinformatics, with the aim of developing sustainable funding models for biological databases, using TAIR as a test case. Phoenix has successfully transitioned TAIR to subscription-based funding while still keeping its data relatively open and accessible.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantAllelesArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsDatabases, GeneticData CurationGenetic Association StudiesArabidopsis Proteinsgenome databaseplantsustainable funding

Identifiers

PMID26201819
PMCPMC4545719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.