ArticleHuman heredity2015
A Statistical Method for Identifying Trait-Associated Copy Number Variants.
Article in Human heredity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational strategies for copy number variation detection, disease association, and beyond.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Review
- Identifying disease-associated copy number variations by a doubly penalized regression model.Biometrics · 2018Article
- A novel copy number variants kernel association test with application to autism spectrum disorders studies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Copy number variants (CNVs), ranging in size from about one kilobase to several megabases, are DNA alterations of a genome that result in the cell having less or more than two copies of segments of the DNA. Such CNVs have been shown to be associated with many complex phenotypes, ranging from diseases to gene expressions. Novel methods have been developed for identifying CNVs both at the individual and at the population level. However, methods for testing CNV association are limited. Most available methods employ a two-step approach, where CNVs carried by the samples are identified first and then tested for association. However, the results of such tests depend on the threshold used for CNV identification and also the number of CNVs to be tested. We developed a method, CNVtest, to directly identify the trait-associated CNVs without the need of identifying sample-specific CNVs. We show that CNVtest asymptotically controls the type I error rate and identifies true trait-associated CNVs with a high probability. We demonstrate the methods using simulations and an application to identify the CNVs that are associated with population differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.