Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26201613›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2015

Lipoprotein-apheresis: Austrian consensus on indication and performance of treatment.

Kurt Derfler, Sabine Steiner, Helmut Sinzinger

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Hyperlipoproteinaemia(a) - apheresis and emerging therapies.Clinical research in cardiology supplements · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kurt DerflerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, AKH, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sabine Steiner
Helmut Sinzinger
European Association of Nuclear Medicine · ATArbeitsgemeinschaft für Klinische Ernährung · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of familial disorders of lipid metabolism in Europe is higher than believed so far. In severely affected patients in whom conventional combined lipid lowering agents are insufficient to achieve target values, patients being intolerant to all the available members of the statin family as well as in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) (100 mg/dl) and progression of atherosclerotic vascular disease, despite even normal low-density lipoproteins (LDL)-cholesterol values, lipoprotein-apheresis treatment is indicated. The Austrian Apheresis Consensus compares the inclusion criteria for patients to be treated in Austria with those from Italy, Germany, Spain, Japan, UK and the United States. The cut off level of 100 mg/dl for lipoprotein(a) is higher in Austria as compared to the aforementioned countries (50 or 60 mg/dl, respectively). The available clinical data reveal that regular weekly lipoprotein apheresis not only results in a significant lowering of the respective atherogenic lipid and lipoprotein parameters, but also in a significant decrease in clinical events and interventions. The underlying mechanisms such as non-lipid effects, side effects as well as the different available treatment principles are compared. For patients meeting the inclusion criteria, lipoprotein apheresis is a safe and effective therapy significantly reducing vascular events.

Indexed as

AustriaBlood Component RemovalEvidence-Based MedicineHumansLipid Metabolism DisordersLipoproteinsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisTreatment OutcomeLipoproteins

Identifiers

PMID26201613
OpenAlexW937083812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.