Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26201421›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2015

D-amino acid inhibits biofilm but not new bone formation in an ovine model.

Andrew J Harmata, Yun Ma, Carlos J Sanchez, Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz, Florent Elefteriou, Joseph C Wenke, Scott A Guelcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Methicillin-resistantMedChemComm · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Eradication ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J HarmataDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 2400 Highland Avenue, 107 Olin Hall, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Yun MaCenter for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Carlos J SanchezExtremity Trauma and Regenerative Medicine Task Area, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Katarzyna J ZienkiewiczDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 2400 Highland Avenue, 107 Olin Hall, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Florent ElefteriouCenter for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Joseph C WenkeExtremity Trauma and Regenerative Medicine Task Area, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Scott A GuelcherDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 2400 Highland Avenue, 107 Olin Hall, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA. Scott.Guelcher@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Biofilm Dispersive Bone Grafts to Improve Healing of Contaminated FracturesR01AR064772 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GUELCHER, SCOTT A, WENKE, JOSEPH C · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfectious complications of musculoskeletal trauma are an important factor contributing to patient morbidity. Biofilm-dispersive bone grafts augmented with D-amino acids (D-AAs) prevent biofilm formation in vitro and in vivo, but the effects of D-AAs on osteocompatibility and new bone formation have not been investigated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Do D-AAs hinder osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation in vitro? (2) Does local delivery of D-AAs from low-viscosity bone grafts inhibit new bone formation in a large-animal model?

methodsMethicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S aureus clinical isolates, mouse bone marrow stromal cells, and osteoclast precursor cells were treated with an equal mass (1:1:1) mixture of D-Pro:D-Met:D-Phe. The effects of the D-AA dose on biofilm inhibition (n = 4), biofilm dispersion (n = 4), and bone marrow stromal cell proliferation (n = 3) were quantitatively measured by crystal violet staining. Osteoblast differentiation was quantitatively assessed by alkaline phosphatase staining, von Kossa staining, and quantitative reverse transcription for the osteogenic factors a1Col1 and Ocn (n = 3). Osteoclast differentiation was quantitatively measured by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining (n = 3). Bone grafts augmented with 0 or 200 mmol/L D-AAs were injected in ovine femoral condyle defects in four sheep. New bone formation was evaluated by μCT and histology 4 months later. An a priori power analysis indicated that a sample size of four would detect a 7.5% difference of bone volume/total volume between groups assuming a mean and SD of 30% and 5%, respectively, with a power of 80% and an alpha level of 0.05 using a two-tailed t-test between the means of two independent samples.

resultsBone marrow stromal cell proliferation, osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclast differentiation were inhibited at D-AAs concentrations of 27 mmol/L or greater in a dose-responsive manner in vitro (p < 0.05). In methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S aureus clinical isolates, D-AAs inhibited biofilm formation at concentrations of 13.5 mmol/L or greater in vitro (p < 0.05). Local delivery of D-AAs from low-viscosity grafts did not inhibit new bone formation in a large-animal model pilot study (0 mmol/L D-AAs: bone volume/total volume = 26.9% ± 4.1%; 200 mmol/L D-AAs: bone volume/total volume = 28.3% ± 15.4%; mean difference with 95% CI = -1.4; p = 0.13).

conclusionsD-AAs inhibit biofilm formation, bone marrow stromal cell proliferation, osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclast differentiation in vitro in a dose-responsive manner. Local delivery of D-AAs from bone grafts did not inhibit new bone formation in vivo at clinically relevant doses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Local delivery of D-AAs is an effective antibiofilm strategy that does not appear to inhibit bone repair. Longitudinal studies investigating bacterial burden, bone formation, and bone remodeling in contaminated defects as a function of D-AA dose are required to further support the use of D-AAs in the clinical management of infected open fractures.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsBiomarkersBone TransplantationCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFemurMesenchymal Stem CellsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMethionineMiceAmino AcidsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersMethioninePhenylalanineProline

Identifiers

PMID26201421
PMCPMC4626484
OpenAlexW943803179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.