Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26201312›Full record

Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2015

Randomised clinical trial: a dose-ranging study of vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. lansoprazole for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis.

K Ashida, Y Sakurai, A Nishimura, K Kudou, N Hiramatsu, E Umegaki, K Iwakiri, T Chiba

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Vonoprazan versus lansoprazole in erosive esophagitis - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Interchangeable Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors Based on Relative Potency.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2018
    Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. [The efficacy of vonoprazan fumarate in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease evaluated by the Chinese version of the RSS-12 scale].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

K AshidaRakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Y SakuraiTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
A NishimuraTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
K KudouTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
N HiramatsuOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
E UmegakiKobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
K IwakiriNippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
T ChibaGraduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeda (Japan) · JPKobe University · JPKyoto University · JPNippon Medical School · JPOsaka University · JPRakuwakai Otowa Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potassium-competitive acid blocker vonoprazan (VPZ) has potent acid-inhibitory effects and may offer clinical advantages over conventional therapy for acid-related disorders.

aimTo investigate the efficacy and safety of VPZ in patients with erosive oesophagitis (EO).

methodsIn this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-ranging study, patients ≥20 years with endoscopically confirmed EO [Los Angeles (LA) grades A-D] received VPZ 5, 10, 20 or 40 mg, or lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg once daily for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of healed EO subjects as shown by endoscopy at week 4.

resultsA total of 732 subjects received VPZ or LPZ. The proportion of healed EO subjects at week 4 was 92.3%, 92.5%, 94.4%, 97.0% and 93.2%, respectively, with VPZ 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg and LPZ 30 mg. All VPZ doses were non-inferior to LPZ when adjusted for baseline LA grades A/B and C/D. Among those with LA grades C/D, the proportions of healed EO subjects were 87.3%, 86.4%, 100%, 96.0% and 87.0%, respectively, with VPZ 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg and LPZ 30 mg. The incidence of adverse events was similar across the groups.

conclusionsVonoprazan was effective and non-inferior to LPZ in healing EO. VPZ 20 mg or higher was highly efficacious for severe EO (LA grades C/D). VPZ was associated with no safety concern during this 8-week study, while there was a dose-dependent increase in serum gastrin. Once-daily VPZ 20 mg is the recommended clinical dose for treating EO.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEsophagitisFemaleGastrinsHumansLansoprazoleLos AngelesMaleMiddle AgedProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamides1-(5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-N-methylmethanamineGastrinsLansoprazoleProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID26201312
PMCPMC5014135
OpenAlexW1503705751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.