Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26200958›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo

ANTHELMINTIC ACTIVITY OF LAPACHOL, β-LAPACHONE AND ITS DERIVATIVES AGAINST Toxocara canis LARVAE.

Taís Mata-Santos, Nitza França Pinto, Hilton Antônio Mata-Santos, Kelly Gallan De Moura, Paula Fernandes Carneiro, Tatiane Dos Santos Carvalho, Karina Pena Del Rio, Maria do Carmo Freire Ribeiro Pinto, Lourdes Rodrigues Martins, Juliana Montelli Fenalti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Human toxocariasis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Enhancing Oral Absorption of β-Lapachone: Progress Till Date.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Taís Mata-SantosLaboratório de Parasitologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Nitza França PintoLaboratório de Parasitologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Hilton Antônio Mata-SantosDepartamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Kelly Gallan De MouraNúcleo de Pesquisa de Produtos Naturais, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Paula Fernandes CarneiroNúcleo de Pesquisa de Produtos Naturais, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Tatiane Dos Santos CarvalhoNúcleo de Pesquisa de Produtos Naturais, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Karina Pena Del RioNúcleo de Pesquisa de Produtos Naturais, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Maria do Carmo Freire Ribeiro PintoNúcleo de Pesquisa de Produtos Naturais, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Lourdes Rodrigues MartinsLaboratório de Parasitologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Juliana Montelli FenaltiLaboratório de Parasitologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Pedro Eduardo Almeida Da SilvaLaboratório de Micobactérias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Carlos James ScainiLaboratório de Parasitologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthelmintics used for intestinal helminthiasis treatment are generally effective; however, their effectiveness in tissue parasitosis (i.e. visceral toxocariasis) is moderate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of lapachol, β-lapachone and phenazines in relation to the viability of Toxocara canis larvae. A concentration of 2 mg/mL (in duplicate) of the compounds was tested using microculture plates containing Toxocara canis larvae in an RPMI-1640 environment, incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 tension for 48 hours. In the 2 mg/mL concentration, four phenazines, lapachol and three of its derivatives presented a larvicide/larvistatic activity of 100%. Then, the minimum larvicide/larvistatic concentration (MLC) test was conducted. The compounds that presented the best results were nor-lapachol (MLC, 1 mg/mL), lapachol (MLC 0.5 mg/mL), β-lapachone, and β-C-allyl-lawsone (MLC, 0.25 mg/mL). The larvae exposed to the compounds, at best MLC with 100% in vitro activity larvicide, were inoculated into healthy BALB/c mice and were not capable of causing infection, confirming the larvicide potential in vitro of these compounds.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthelminticsFemaleLarvaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNaphthoquinonesParasitic Sensitivity TestsToxocara canisAnthelminticsbeta-lapachonelapacholNaphthoquinones

Identifiers

PMID26200958
PMCPMC4544242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.