Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26200865›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Regulation of membrane-shape transitions induced by I-BAR domains.

Zhiming Chen, Zheng Shi, Tobias Baumgart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pulling Membrane Nanotubes from Giant Unilamellar Vesicles.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
  12. Deciphering the BAR code of membrane modulators.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Physical basis of some membrane shaping mechanisms.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhiming ChenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Zheng ShiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tobias BaumgartDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: baumgart@sas.upenn.edu.

Funding

Membrane shape transition control in cellular membrane trafficking phenomenaR01GM097552 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BAUMGART, TOBIAS · 2011 to 2023
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-097552NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I-BAR proteins are well-known actin-cytoskeleton adaptors and have been observed to be involved in the formation of plasma membrane protrusions (filopodia). I-BAR proteins contain an all-helical, crescent-shaped IRSp53-MIM domain (IMD) dimer that is believed to be able to couple with a membrane shape. This coupling could involve the sensing and even the generation of negative plasma membrane curvature. Indeed, the in vitro studies have shown that IMDs can induce inward tubulation of liposomes. While N-BAR domains, which generate positive membrane curvature, have received a considerable amount of attention from both theory and experiments, the mechanisms of curvature coupling through IMDs are comparatively less studied and understood. Here we used a membrane-shape stability assay developed recently in our lab to quantitatively characterize IMD-induced membrane-shape transitions. We determined a membrane-shape stability diagram for IMDs that reveals how membrane tension and protein density can comodulate the generation of IMD-induced membrane protrusions. From comparison to analytical theory, we determine three key parameters that characterize the curvature coupling of IMD. We find that the curvature generation capacity of IMDs is significantly stronger compared to that of endophilin, an N-BAR protein known to be involved in plasma membrane shape transitions. Contrary to N-BAR domains, where amphipathic helix insertion is known to promote its membrane curvature generation, for IMDs we find that amphipathic helices inhibit membrane shape transitions, consistent with the inverse curvature that IMDs generate. Importantly, in both of these types of BAR domains, electrostatic interactions affect membrane-binding capacity, but do not appear to affect the curvature generation capacity of the protein. These two types of BAR domain proteins show qualitatively similar membrane shape stability diagrams, suggesting an underlying ubiquitous mechanism by which peripheral proteins regulate membrane curvature.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneCell Surface ExtensionsDimerizationHumansMembrane ProteinsMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylethanolaminesProtein Structure, TertiaryStatic ElectricitySurface TensionUnilamellar Liposomes1,2-oleoylphosphatidylcholinedioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamineMembrane ProteinsPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylethanolaminesUnilamellar Liposomes

Identifiers

PMID26200865
PMCPMC4621619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.